John Ritt

Male, Age 37 Norwalk, Connecticut

John Ritt is a 37 years old male, born on Friday, 11th of October 1985. He will turn 38 on October 11, 2024. Our records show he currently resides at 19 Berkeley Street Apt C, Norwalk, 06850-0000 and is affiliated with the No known party affiliation. John is registered to vote in Connecticut since September 28, 2004.

Overview of John Ritt

Age: 37

Gender: male

Birth year: 1986

Lives in: Norwalk

Phone number: 203-803-3581

John Ritt's Voting Profile

Registered to vote since: September 28, 2004

Party Affiliation: No known party affiliation

Status: I

Precinct: 02

District: 137

Polling place: St. Marys Community Hall

Voter ID: 999995224

Congressional District: 004

House District: 137

Senate District: 025

John Ritt Adress & Maps

Show Map

Thomas Gerard Adams

Neighbors for John Ritt

15 Berkeley Street, Norwalk, 06850-3916
No known party affiliation
15 Berkeley Street, Norwalk, 06850-3916
No known party affiliation
15 Berkeley Street 2, Norwalk, 06850-3916
No known party affiliation
17 Berkeley Street, Norwalk, 06850-3916
No known party affiliation
17 Berkeley Street, Norwalk, 06850-3916
No known party affiliation
17 Berkeley Street, Norwalk, 06850-3916
No known party affiliation
17 Berkeley Street, Norwalk, 06850-3916
No known party affiliation
19 Berkeley Street 1a, Norwalk, 06850-3982
No known party affiliation
19 Berkeley Street E, Norwalk, 06850-3982
No known party affiliation
19 Berkeley Street D, Norwalk, 06850-3982
No known party affiliation
20 Berkeley Street 1, Norwalk, 06850-3915
No known party affiliation
20 Berkeley Street 2nd Fl, Norwalk, 06850-3915
No known party affiliation
20 Berkeley Street 3, Norwalk, 06850-3915
No known party affiliation
20 Berkeley Street 1, Norwalk, 06850-3915
No known party affiliation
20 Berkeley Street, Norwalk, 06850-3915
No known party affiliation

Income

Salary: $107,089

Net Worth: $836,149

*This information is estimated by an algorithm and does not come from any public data. These numbers are only guesses and should not be considered to be accurate.