Val J Scansaroli

Male, Age 71 Norwalk, Connecticut

Val J Scansaroli is a 71 years old male, born on Sunday, 5th of August 1951. He will turn 72 on August 05, 2025. Our records show he currently resides at 603 Foxboro Drive, Norwalk, Ct 06851-1149 and is not affiliated with any political party. Val is registered to vote in Connecticut since June 11, 1999.

Overview of Val J Scansaroli

Age: 71

Gender: male

Birth year: 1952

Lives in: Norwalk

Val J Scansaroli's Voting Profile

Registered to vote since: June 11, 1999

Party Affiliation: No known party affiliation

Status: A

Precinct: 03

District: 142

Polling place: West Rocks Middle School

Voter ID: 999979208

Congressional District: 004

House District: 142

Senate District: 025

Val J Scansaroli Adress & Maps

Show Map

Thomas Gerard Adams

Neighbors for Val J Scansaroli

516 Foxboro Drive, Norwalk, Ct 06851-1157
No known party affiliation
516 Foxboro Drive, Norwalk, Ct 06851-1157
No known party affiliation
517 Foxboro Drive, Norwalk, Ct 06851-1157
No known party affiliation
518 Foxboro Drive, Norwalk, Ct 06851-1157
No known party affiliation
601 Foxboro Drive, Norwalk, Ct 06851-1149
No known party affiliation
601 Foxboro Drive, Norwalk, Ct 06851-1149
No known party affiliation
602 Foxboro Drive, Norwalk, Ct 06851-1149
No known party affiliation
605 Foxboro Drive, Norwalk, Ct 06851-1149
No known party affiliation
607 Foxboro Drive, Norwalk, Ct 06851-1149
No known party affiliation
607 Foxboro Drive, Norwalk, Ct 06851-1149
No known party affiliation
608 Foxboro Drive, Norwalk, Ct 06851-1149
No known party affiliation
610 Foxboro Drive, Norwalk, Ct 06851-1149
No known party affiliation
611 Foxboro Drive, Norwalk, Ct 06851-1149
No known party affiliation
612 Foxboro Drive, Norwalk, Ct 06851-1149
No known party affiliation
614 Foxboro Drive, Norwalk, Ct 06851-1149
No known party affiliation

Income

Salary: $66,930

Net Worth: $549,609

*This information is estimated by an algorithm and does not come from any public data. These numbers are only guesses and should not be considered to be accurate.