Joe Fields

Male, Age 81 Norwalk, Connecticut

Joe Fields is a 81 years old male, born on Monday, 18th of August 1941. He will turn 82 on August 18, 2024. Our records show he currently resides at 90 Truman Street, Norwalk, Ct 06850-3553 and is affiliated with the No known party affiliation. Joe is registered to vote in Connecticut since October 20, 1992.

Overview of Joe Fields

Age: 81

Gender: male

Birth year: 1942

Lives in: Norwalk

Phone number: 203-854-5273

Joe Fields's Voting Profile

Registered to vote since: October 20, 1992

Party Affiliation: No known party affiliation

Status: A

Precinct: 02

District: 137

Polling place: St. Marys Community Hall

Voter ID: 999966544

Congressional District: 004

House District: 137

Senate District: 025

Joe Fields Adress & Maps

Show Map

Thomas Gerard Adams

Neighbors for Joe Fields

73 Truman Street, Norwalk, Ct 06850-0000
No known party affiliation
79 Truman Street, Norwalk, Ct 06850-3555
No known party affiliation
80 Truman Street 1, Norwalk, Ct 06850-3553
No known party affiliation
82 Truman Street, Norwalk, Ct 06850-3553
No known party affiliation
82 Truman Street, Norwalk, Ct 06850-3553
No known party affiliation
82 Truman Street, Norwalk, Ct 06850-3553
No known party affiliation
84 Truman Street, Norwalk, Ct 06850-3553
No known party affiliation
90 Truman Street, Norwalk, Ct 06850-3553
No known party affiliation
92 Truman Street, Norwalk, Ct 06850-3553
No known party affiliation
94 Truman Street, Norwalk, Ct 06850-3553
No known party affiliation
96 Truman Street D, Norwalk, Ct 06850-3585
No known party affiliation
96 Truman Street A, Norwalk, Ct 06850-3585
No known party affiliation
96 Truman Street C, Norwalk, Ct 06850-3585
No known party affiliation
96 Truman Street B, Norwalk, Ct 06850-3585
No known party affiliation
96 Truman Street A, Norwalk, Ct 06850-3585
No known party affiliation

Income

Salary: $97,961

Net Worth: $326,750

*This information is estimated by an algorithm and does not come from any public data. These numbers are only guesses and should not be considered to be accurate.