Warner Forbes Jr

Male, Age 66 Norwalk, Connecticut

Warner Forbes Jr is a 66 years old male, born on Monday, 1st of April 1957. He will turn 67 on April 01, 2024. Our records show he currently resides at 1 Arch Street, Norwalk, Ct 06850-3983 and is not affiliated with any political party. Warner is registered to vote in Connecticut since March 8, 1988.

Overview of Warner Forbes Jr

Age: 66

Gender: male

Birth year: 1957

Lives in: Norwalk

Phone number: 203-854-9502

Warner Forbes Jr's Voting Profile

Registered to vote since: March 8, 1988

Party Affiliation: No known party affiliation

Status: A

Precinct: 02

District: 137

Polling place: St. Marys Community Hall

Voter ID: 999958640

Congressional District: 004

House District: 137

Senate District: 025

Warner Forbes Jr Adress & Maps

Show Map

Thomas Gerard Adams

Neighbors for Warner Forbes Jr

1 Arch Street 1, Norwalk, Ct 06850-3983
No known party affiliation
1 Arch Street 8, Norwalk, Ct 06850-3983
No known party affiliation
1 Arch Street 9, Norwalk, Ct 06850-3983
No known party affiliation
1 Arch Street Spt 6, Norwalk, Ct 06850-3983
No known party affiliation
1 Arch Street 4, Norwalk, Ct 06850-3983
No known party affiliation
1 Arch Street 1, Norwalk, Ct 06850-3983
No known party affiliation
4 Arch Street 7h, Norwalk, Ct 06850-3922
No known party affiliation
4 Arch Street H, Norwalk, Ct 06850-3922
No known party affiliation
4 Arch Street G, Norwalk, Ct 06850-3922
No known party affiliation
5 Arch Street 2, Norwalk, Ct 06850-3977
No known party affiliation
5 Arch Street 2, Norwalk, Ct 06850-3977
No known party affiliation
5 Arch Street 2, Norwalk, Ct 06850-3977
No known party affiliation
5 Arch Street, Norwalk, Ct 06850-3977
No known party affiliation
6 Arch Street F, Norwalk, Ct 06850-3940
No known party affiliation
6 Arch Street D, Norwalk, Ct 06850-3940
No known party affiliation

Income

Salary: $67,190

Net Worth: $1,251,850

*This information is estimated by an algorithm and does not come from any public data. These numbers are only guesses and should not be considered to be accurate.