Janelly Sanchez

Female, Age 32 Danbury, Connecticut

Janelly Sanchez is a 32 years old female, born on Tuesday, 11th of June 1991. She will turn 33 on June 11, 2025. Our records show she currently resides at 15 Putnam Drive, Danbury, Ct 06810-8030 and is not affiliated with any political party. Janelly is registered to vote in Connecticut since September 8, 2020.

Overview of Janelly Sanchez

Age: 32

Gender: female

Birth year: 1991

Lives in: Danbury

Phone number: 203-482-2328

Janelly Sanchez's Voting Profile

Registered to vote since: September 8, 2020

Party Affiliation: No known party affiliation

Status: A

Precinct: 10

District: 004

Polling place: Shelter Rock School Gym

Voter ID: 005187402

Congressional District: 005

House District: 110

Senate District: 024

Janelly Sanchez Adress & Maps

Show Map

Thomas Gerard Adams

Neighbors for Janelly Sanchez

12 Putnam Drive, Danbury, Ct 06810-8030
No known party affiliation
12 Putnam Drive, Danbury, Ct 06810-8030
No known party affiliation
12 Putnam Drive, Danbury, Ct 06810-8030
No known party affiliation
13 Putnam Drive, Danbury, Ct 06810-8030
No known party affiliation
14 Putnam Drive, Danbury, Ct 06810-8030
No known party affiliation
14 Putnam Drive, Danbury, Ct 06810-8030
No known party affiliation
14 Putnam Drive, Danbury, Ct 06810-8030
No known party affiliation
17 Putnam Drive, Danbury, Ct 06810-8030
No known party affiliation
18 Putnam Drive, Danbury, Ct 06810-8030
No known party affiliation
18 Putnam Drive, Danbury, Ct 06810-8030
No known party affiliation
19 Putnam Drive, Danbury, Ct 06810-8030
No known party affiliation
19 Putnam Drive, Danbury, Ct 06810-8030
No known party affiliation
20 Putnam Drive, Danbury, Ct 06810-8030
No known party affiliation
20 Putnam Drive, Danbury, Ct 06810-8030
No known party affiliation
20 Putnam Drive, Danbury, Ct 06810-8030
No known party affiliation

Income

Salary: $37,216

Net Worth: $1,083,279

*This information is estimated by an algorithm and does not come from any public data. These numbers are only guesses and should not be considered to be accurate.