Emad Uddin

Male, Age 31 Waterbury , Connecticut

Emad Uddin is a 31 years old male, born on Wednesday, 5th of August 1992. He will turn 32 on August 05, 2024. Our records show he currently resides at 497 Scott Road 7, Waterbury , Ct 06705-3769 and is affiliated with the No known party affiliation. Emad is registered to vote in Connecticut since August 31, 2020.

Overview of Emad Uddin

Age: 31

Gender: male

Birth year: 1992

Lives in: Waterbury

Emad Uddin's Voting Profile

Registered to vote since: August 31, 2020

Party Affiliation: No known party affiliation

Status: A

Precinct: 02

District: 074

Polling place: Crosby High School

Voter ID: 005181210

Congressional District: 005

House District: 074

Senate District: 016

Emad Uddin Adress & Maps

Show Map

Thomas Gerard Adams

Neighbors for Emad Uddin

482 Scott Road, Waterbury , Ct 06705-3739
No known party affiliation
488 Scott Road, Waterbury , Ct 06705-3739
No known party affiliation
490 Scott Road, Waterbury , Ct 06705-3739
No known party affiliation
492 Scott Road, Waterbury , Ct 06705-3739
No known party affiliation
495 Scott Road 3, Waterbury , Ct 06705-5728
No known party affiliation
495 Scott Road 2, Waterbury , Ct 06705-5728
No known party affiliation
495 Scott Road 1, Waterbury , Ct 06705-5728
No known party affiliation
497 Scott Road 11, Waterbury , Ct 06705-3769
No known party affiliation
497 Scott Road 10, Waterbury , Ct 06705-3769
No known party affiliation
497 Scott Road 7, Waterbury , Ct 06705-3769
No known party affiliation
497 Scott Road 5, Waterbury , Ct 06705-3769
No known party affiliation
497 Scott Road 11, Waterbury , Ct 06705-3769
No known party affiliation
497 Scott Road 8, Waterbury , Ct 06705-3769
No known party affiliation
497 Scott Road 10, Waterbury , Ct 06705-3769
No known party affiliation
497 Scott Road, Waterbury , Ct 06705-3769
No known party affiliation

Income

Salary: $33,592

Net Worth: $961,620

*This information is estimated by an algorithm and does not come from any public data. These numbers are only guesses and should not be considered to be accurate.