Jakub Gajda

Male, Age 23 New Britain, Connecticut

Jakub Gajda is a 23 years old male, born on Friday, 22nd of October 1999. He will turn 24 on October 22, 2024. Our records show he currently resides at 45 Kennedy Drive, New Britain, 06051-4137 and is not affiliated with any political party. Jakub is registered to vote in Connecticut since August 4, 2020.

Overview of Jakub Gajda

Age: 23

Gender: male

Birth year: 1999

Lives in: New Britain

Phone number: 860-849-5989

Jakub Gajda's Voting Profile

Registered to vote since: August 4, 2020

Party Affiliation: No known party affiliation

Status: A

Precinct: 00

District: 002

Polling place: V F W Hall

Voter ID: 005160561

Congressional District: 005

House District: 024

Senate District: 006

Jakub Gajda Adress & Maps

Show Map

Thomas Gerard Adams

Neighbors for Jakub Gajda

33 Kennedy Drive, New Britain, 06051-4137
No known party affiliation
33 Kennedy Drive, New Britain, 06051-4137
No known party affiliation
33 Kennedy Drive, New Britain, 06051-0000
No known party affiliation
34 Kennedy Drive, New Britain, 06051-4116
No known party affiliation
34 Kennedy Drive, New Britain, 06051-4116
No known party affiliation
39 Kennedy Drive, New Britain, 06051-4137
No known party affiliation
39 Kennedy Drive, New Britain, 06051-4137
No known party affiliation
45 Kennedy Drive, New Britain, 06051-4137
No known party affiliation
46 Kennedy Drive, New Britain, 06051-4116
No known party affiliation
51 Kennedy Drive, New Britain, 06051-4137
No known party affiliation
52 Kennedy Drive, New Britain, 06051-4116
No known party affiliation
57 Kennedy Drive, New Britain, 06051-4137
No known party affiliation
58 Kennedy Drive, New Britain, 06051-4116
No known party affiliation
58 Kennedy Drive, New Britain, 06051-4116
No known party affiliation
63 Kennedy Drive, New Britain, 06051-4137
No known party affiliation

Income

Salary: $106,845

Net Worth: $530,528

*This information is estimated by an algorithm and does not come from any public data. These numbers are only guesses and should not be considered to be accurate.