John N Givissis

Male, Age 58 New Milford, Connecticut

John N Givissis is a 58 years old male, born on Sunday, 19th of July 1964. He will turn 59 on July 19, 2024. Our records show he currently resides at 7 Concord Way, New Milford, Ct 06776-5746 and is affiliated with the No known party affiliation. John is registered to vote in Connecticut since July 31, 2020.

Overview of John N Givissis

Age: 58

Gender: male

Birth year: 1965

Lives in: New Milford

John N Givissis's Voting Profile

Registered to vote since: July 31, 2020

Party Affiliation: No known party affiliation

Status: A

Precinct: 00

District: 003

Polling place: Odd Fellows Lodge

Voter ID: 005158071

Congressional District: 005

House District: 108

Senate District: 030

John N Givissis Adress & Maps

Show Map

Thomas Gerard Adams

Neighbors for John N Givissis

3 Concord Way, New Milford, Ct 06776-5746
No known party affiliation
3 Concord Way, New Milford, Ct 06776-5746
No known party affiliation
3 Concord Way, New Milford, Ct 06776-5746
No known party affiliation
5 Concord Way, New Milford, Ct 06776-5746
No known party affiliation
5 Concord Way, New Milford, Ct 06776-5746
No known party affiliation
8 Concord Way, New Milford, Ct 06776-5746
No known party affiliation
9 Concord Way, New Milford, Ct 06776-5746
No known party affiliation
9 Concord Way, New Milford, Ct 06776-5746
No known party affiliation
11 Concord Way, New Milford, Ct 06776-5746
No known party affiliation
11 Concord Way, New Milford, Ct 06776-5746
No known party affiliation
11 Concord Way, New Milford, Ct 06776-5746
No known party affiliation
11 Concord Way, New Milford, Ct 06776-5746
No known party affiliation
12 Concord Way, New Milford, Ct 06776-5746
No known party affiliation
13 Concord Way, New Milford, Ct 06776-5746
No known party affiliation
14 Concord Way, New Milford, Ct 06776-5746
No known party affiliation

Income

Salary: $68,795

Net Worth: $1,138,464

*This information is estimated by an algorithm and does not come from any public data. These numbers are only guesses and should not be considered to be accurate.