Joel Spinelli

Male, Age 23 Southington, Connecticut

Joel Spinelli is a 23 years old male, born on Thursday, 23rd of December 1999. He will turn 24 on December 23, 2024. Our records show he currently resides at 23 Russet Lane, Southington, Ct 06489-1795 and is affiliated with the No known party affiliation. Joel is registered to vote in Connecticut since June 3, 2020.

Overview of Joel Spinelli

Age: 23

Gender: male

Birth year: 2000

Lives in: Southington

Joel Spinelli's Voting Profile

Registered to vote since: June 3, 2020

Party Affiliation: No known party affiliation

Status: A

Precinct: 00

District: 009

Polling place: Tabernacle

Voter ID: 005136054

Congressional District: 001

House District: 030

Senate District: 016

Joel Spinelli Adress & Maps

Show Map

Thomas Gerard Adams

Neighbors for Joel Spinelli

27 Russet Lane, Southington, Ct 06489-1795
No known party affiliation
27 Russet Lane, Southington, Ct 06489-1795
No known party affiliation
32 Russet Lane, Southington, Ct 06489-1771
No known party affiliation
32 Russet Lane, Southington, Ct 06489-1771
No known party affiliation
35 Russet Lane, Southington, Ct 06489-1795
No known party affiliation
41 Russet Lane, Southington, Ct 06489-1795
No known party affiliation
41 Russet Lane, Southington, Ct 06489-1795
No known party affiliation
41 Russet Lane, Southington, Ct 06489-1795
No known party affiliation
49 Russet Lane, Southington, Ct 06489-1795
No known party affiliation
49 Russet Lane, Southington, Ct 06489-1795
No known party affiliation
58 Russet Lane, Southington, Ct 06489-1771
No known party affiliation
58 Russet Lane, Southington, Ct 06489-1771
No known party affiliation
59 Russet Lane, Southington, Ct 06489-1795
No known party affiliation
59 Russet Lane, Southington, Ct 06489-1795
No known party affiliation
69 Russet Lane, Southington, Ct 06489-1795
No known party affiliation

Income

Salary: $69,966

Net Worth: $495,787

*This information is estimated by an algorithm and does not come from any public data. These numbers are only guesses and should not be considered to be accurate.