1. Home
  2. Cities in Connecticut
  3. 06088 East Windsor
  4. Fairway Drive

Shawn Everett Wassell

Male, Age 49 East Windsor, Connecticut

Shawn Everett Wassell is a 49 years old male, born on Friday, 16th of November 1973. He will turn 50 on November 16, 2024. Our records show he currently resides at 244 Fairway Drive, East Windsor, Ct 06088-9758 and is not affiliated with any political party. Shawn is registered to vote in Connecticut since January 29, 2020.

Overview of Shawn Everett Wassell

Age: 49

Gender: male

Birth year: 1974

Lives in: East Windsor

Shawn Everett Wassell's Voting Profile

Registered to vote since: January 29, 2020

Party Affiliation: No known party affiliation

Status: A

Precinct: 00

District: 001

Polling place: Town Hall Annex

Voter ID: 005111809

Congressional District: 001

House District: 057

Senate District: 003

Shawn Everett Wassell Adress & Maps

Show Map

Residential Address

244 Fairway Drive, East Windsor, Ct 06088-9758

Thomas Gerard Adams

Neighbors for Shawn Everett Wassell

Ryan E Veilleux(33)
230 Fairway Drive, East Windsor, Ct 06088-9758
No known party affiliation
Charlene R Delgreco(63)
230 Fairway Drive, East Windsor, Ct 06088-9758
No known party affiliation
Kathryn S Stack(61)
231 Fairway Drive, East Windsor, Ct 06088-9758
No known party affiliation
Toriana Nicole Rugani(25)
233 Fairway Drive, East Windsor, Ct 06088-9758
No known party affiliation
Brianna Rugani(31)
233 Fairway Drive, East Windsor, Ct 06088-9758
No known party affiliation
Rechele T Bastarache(52)
239 Fairway Drive, East Windsor, Ct 06088-9758
No known party affiliation
Roger J Bastarache Sr.(85)
239 Fairway Drive, East Windsor, Ct 06088-9758
No known party affiliation
Laurie A Holmes(60)
244 Fairway Drive, East Windsor, Ct 06088-9758
No known party affiliation
View all neighbors on 244 Fairway Drive, East Windsor, Ct 06088-9758

Income

Salary: $81,634

Net Worth: $713,191

*This information is estimated by an algorithm and does not come from any public data. These numbers are only guesses and should not be considered to be accurate.