Samuel S Grunkorn

Male, Age 86 Greenwich , Connecticut

Samuel S Grunkorn is a 86 years old male, born on Sunday, 11th of October 1936. He will turn 87 on October 11, 2025. Our records show he currently resides at 43 Sterling Road, Greenwich , 06831-2627 and is affiliated with the No known party affiliation. Samuel is registered to vote in Connecticut since January 23, 2020.

Overview of Samuel S Grunkorn

Age: 86

Gender: male

Birth year: 1936

Lives in: Greenwich

Samuel S Grunkorn's Voting Profile

Registered to vote since: January 23, 2020

Party Affiliation: No known party affiliation

Status: A

Precinct: 00

District: 010

Polling place: Glenville School

Voter ID: 005109924

Congressional District: 004

House District: 149

Senate District: 036

Samuel S Grunkorn Adress & Maps

Show Map

Thomas Gerard Adams

Neighbors for Samuel S Grunkorn

17 Sterling Road, Greenwich , 06831-2627
No known party affiliation
35 Sterling Road, Greenwich , 06831-2627
No known party affiliation
35 Sterling Road, Greenwich , 06831-2627
No known party affiliation
53 Sterling Road, Greenwich , 06831-2627
No known party affiliation
53 Sterling Road, Greenwich , 06831-2627
No known party affiliation
62 Sterling Road, Greenwich , 06831-2628
No known party affiliation
62 Sterling Road, Greenwich , 06831-2628
No known party affiliation
62 Sterling Road, Greenwich , 06831-2628
No known party affiliation
63 Sterling Road, Greenwich , 06831-2627
No known party affiliation
63 Sterling Road, Greenwich , 06831-2627
No known party affiliation
73 Sterling Road, Greenwich , 06831-2627
No known party affiliation
73 Sterling Road, Greenwich , 06831-2627
No known party affiliation
73 Sterling Road, Greenwich , 06831-2627
No known party affiliation
75 Sterling Road, Greenwich , 06831-2627
No known party affiliation
75 Sterling Road, Greenwich , 06831-2627
No known party affiliation

Income

Salary: $41,144

Net Worth: $92,947

*This information is estimated by an algorithm and does not come from any public data. These numbers are only guesses and should not be considered to be accurate.