Raymond Clifford

Male, Age 69 Southington, Connecticut

Raymond Clifford is a 69 years old male, born on Friday, 23rd of July 1954. He will turn 70 on July 23, 2024. Our records show he currently resides at 3 South Road, Southington, Ct 06489-1835 and is affiliated with the No known party affiliation. Raymond is registered to vote in Connecticut since December 30, 2019.

Overview of Raymond Clifford

Age: 69

Gender: male

Birth year: 1954

Lives in: Southington

Raymond Clifford's Voting Profile

Registered to vote since: December 30, 2019

Party Affiliation: No known party affiliation

Status: A

Precinct: 00

District: 009

Polling place: Tabernacle

Voter ID: 005103403

Congressional District: 001

House District: 030

Senate District: 016

Raymond Clifford Adress & Maps

Show Map

Thomas Gerard Adams

Neighbors for Raymond Clifford

1 South Road, Southington, Ct 06489-1835
No known party affiliation
1 South Road, Southington, Ct 06489-1835
No known party affiliation
2 South Road, Southington, Ct 06489-1832
No known party affiliation
2 South Road, Southington, Ct 06489-1832
No known party affiliation
3 South Road, Southington, Ct 06489-1835
No known party affiliation
5 South Road, Southington, Ct 06489-1835
No known party affiliation
6 South Road, Southington, Ct 06489-1832
No known party affiliation
6 South Road, Southington, Ct 06489-1832
No known party affiliation
8 South Road, Southington, Ct 06489-1832
No known party affiliation
11 South Road, Southington, Ct 06489-1835
No known party affiliation
14 South Road, Southington, Ct 06489-1832
No known party affiliation
15 South Road, Southington, Ct 06489-1835
No known party affiliation
17 South Road, Southington, Ct 06489-1835
No known party affiliation
20 South Road, Southington, Ct 06489-1832
No known party affiliation
20 South Road, Southington, Ct 06489-1832
No known party affiliation

Income

Salary: $74,642

Net Worth: $403,431

*This information is estimated by an algorithm and does not come from any public data. These numbers are only guesses and should not be considered to be accurate.