Jusuf Bitik

Male, Age 22 Waterbury , Connecticut

Jusuf Bitik is a 22 years old male, born on Tuesday, 27th of June 2000. He will turn 23 on June 27, 2025. Our records show he currently resides at 210 Nichols Drive, Waterbury , 06708-4703 and is not affiliated with any political party. Jusuf is registered to vote in Connecticut since December 4, 2019.

Overview of Jusuf Bitik

Age: 22

Gender: male

Birth year: 2000

Lives in: Waterbury

Phone number: 203-465-8269

Jusuf Bitik's Voting Profile

Registered to vote since: December 4, 2019

Party Affiliation: No known party affiliation

Status: A

Precinct: 03

District: 071

Polling place: Tinker School

Voter ID: 005098481

Congressional District: 003

House District: 071

Senate District: 015

Jusuf Bitik Adress & Maps

Show Map

Thomas Gerard Adams

Neighbors for Jusuf Bitik

199 Nichols Drive, Waterbury , 06708-4742
No known party affiliation
200 Nichols Drive, Waterbury , 06708-4703
No known party affiliation
200 Nichols Drive, Waterbury , 06708-4703
No known party affiliation
200 Nichols Drive, Waterbury , 06708-4703
No known party affiliation
207 Nichols Drive, Waterbury , 06708-4742
No known party affiliation
207 Nichols Drive, Waterbury , 06708-4742
No known party affiliation
207 Nichols Drive, Waterbury , 06708-4742
No known party affiliation
210 Nichols Drive, Waterbury , 06708-4703
No known party affiliation
213 Nichols Drive, Waterbury , 06708-4742
No known party affiliation
213 Nichols Drive, Waterbury , 06708-4742
No known party affiliation
213 Nichols Drive, Waterbury , 06708-4742
No known party affiliation
214 Nichols Drive, Waterbury , 06708-4703
No known party affiliation
214 Nichols Drive, Waterbury , 06708-4703
No known party affiliation
220 Nichols Drive, Waterbury , 06708-4703
No known party affiliation
221 Nichols Drive, Waterbury , 06708-4742
No known party affiliation

Income

Salary: $98,670

Net Worth: $1,250,992

*This information is estimated by an algorithm and does not come from any public data. These numbers are only guesses and should not be considered to be accurate.