Jonathan Zak Punko

Male, Age 51 Avon, Connecticut

Jonathan Zak Punko is a 51 years old male, born on Saturday, 4th of December 1971. He will turn 52 on December 04, 2024. Our records show he currently resides at 111 Parkview Drive, Avon, Ct 06001-3452 and is affiliated with the No known party affiliation. Jonathan is registered to vote in Connecticut since November 15, 2019.

Overview of Jonathan Zak Punko

Age: 51

Gender: male

Birth year: 1972

Lives in: Avon

Jonathan Zak Punko's Voting Profile

Registered to vote since: November 15, 2019

Party Affiliation: No known party affiliation

Status: A

Precinct: 00

District: 001

Polling place: Avon High School Gymnasium

Voter ID: 005094284

Congressional District: 005

House District: 017

Senate District: 008

Jonathan Zak Punko Adress & Maps

Show Map

Thomas Gerard Adams

Neighbors for Jonathan Zak Punko

102 Parkview Drive, Avon, Ct 06001-3453
No known party affiliation
105 Parkview Drive, Avon, Ct 06001-3452
No known party affiliation
105 Parkview Drive, Avon, Ct 06001-3452
No known party affiliation
105 Parkview Drive, Avon, Ct 06001-3452
No known party affiliation
105 Parkview Drive, Avon, Ct 06001-3452
No known party affiliation
110 Parkview Drive, Avon, Ct 06001-3453
No known party affiliation
110 Parkview Drive, Avon, Ct 06001-3453
No known party affiliation
111 Parkview Drive, Avon, Ct 06001-3452
No known party affiliation
117 Parkview Drive, Avon, Ct 06001-3452
No known party affiliation
117 Parkview Drive, Avon, Ct 06001-3452
No known party affiliation
117 Parkview Drive, Avon, Ct 06001-3452
No known party affiliation
117 Parkview Drive, Avon, Ct 06001-3452
No known party affiliation
118 Parkview Drive, Avon, Ct 06001-3453
No known party affiliation
118 Parkview Drive, Avon, Ct 06001-3453
No known party affiliation
124 Parkview Drive, Avon, Ct 06001-3453
No known party affiliation

Income

Salary: $59,165

Net Worth: $1,178,691

*This information is estimated by an algorithm and does not come from any public data. These numbers are only guesses and should not be considered to be accurate.