Morenci Cecilia Clark

Female, Age 50 Prospect , Connecticut

Morenci Cecilia Clark is a 50 years old female, born on Sunday, 23rd of September 1973. She will turn 51 on September 23, 2024. Our records show she currently resides at 93 Cook Road, Prospect , Ct 06712-1807 and is not affiliated with any political party. Morenci is registered to vote in Connecticut since October 22, 2019.

Overview of Morenci Cecilia Clark

Age: 50

Gender: female

Birth year: 1973

Lives in: Prospect

Morenci Cecilia Clark's Voting Profile

Registered to vote since: October 22, 2019

Party Affiliation: No known party affiliation

Status: A

Precinct: 00

District: 001

Polling place: Prospect Firehouse

Voter ID: 005084592

Congressional District: 003

House District: 089

Senate District: 016

Morenci Cecilia Clark Adress & Maps

Show Map

Thomas Gerard Adams

Neighbors for Morenci Cecilia Clark

83 Cook Road, Prospect , Ct 06712-1807
No known party affiliation
83 Cook Road, Prospect , Ct 06712-1807
No known party affiliation
85 Cook Road, Prospect , Ct 06712-1807
No known party affiliation
90 Cook Road, Prospect , Ct 06712-1806
No known party affiliation
91 Cook Road, Prospect , Ct 06712-1807
No known party affiliation
92 Cook Road, Prospect , Ct 06712-1806
No known party affiliation
92 Cook Road, Prospect , Ct 06712-1806
No known party affiliation
93 Cook Road, Prospect , Ct 06712-1807
No known party affiliation
94 Cook Road, Prospect , Ct 06712-1806
No known party affiliation
95 Cook Road, Prospect , Ct 06712-1807
No known party affiliation
95 Cook Road, Prospect , Ct 06712-1807
No known party affiliation
95 Cook Road, Prospect , Ct 06712-1807
No known party affiliation
97 Cook Road, Prospect , Ct 06712-1807
No known party affiliation
97 Cook Road, Prospect , Ct 06712-1807
No known party affiliation
99 Cook Road, Prospect , Ct 06712-1807
No known party affiliation

Income

Salary: $47,556

Net Worth: $266,839

*This information is estimated by an algorithm and does not come from any public data. These numbers are only guesses and should not be considered to be accurate.