Amelia Cabrera

Female, Age 57 Stamford , Connecticut

Amelia Cabrera is a 57 years old female, born on Saturday, 8th of October 1966. She will turn 58 on October 08, 2024. Our records show she currently resides at 80 Dean Street, Stamford , Ct 06902-6205 and is affiliated with the No known party affiliation. Amelia is registered to vote in Connecticut since October 9, 2019.

Overview of Amelia Cabrera

Age: 57

Gender: female

Birth year: 1967

Lives in: Stamford

Amelia Cabrera's Voting Profile

Registered to vote since: October 9, 2019

Party Affiliation: No known party affiliation

Status: A

Precinct: 00

District: 003

Polling place: Murphy School

Voter ID: 005080639

Congressional District: 004

House District: 148

Senate District: 027

Amelia Cabrera Adress & Maps

Show Map

Thomas Gerard Adams

Neighbors for Amelia Cabrera

64 Dean Street, Stamford , Ct 06902-6205
No known party affiliation
64 Dean Street, Stamford , Ct 06902-6205
No known party affiliation
64 Dean Street, Stamford , Ct 06902-6205
No known party affiliation
70 Dean Street, Stamford , Ct 06902-6205
No known party affiliation
70 Dean Street, Stamford , Ct 06902-6205
No known party affiliation
70 Dean Street, Stamford , Ct 06902-6205
No known party affiliation
74 Dean Street, Stamford , Ct 06902-6205
No known party affiliation
80 Dean Street, Stamford , Ct 06902-6205
No known party affiliation
80 Dean Street 1fl, Stamford , Ct 06902-6205
No known party affiliation
80 Dean Street, Stamford , Ct 06902-6205
No known party affiliation
80 Dean Street 1fl, Stamford , Ct 06902-6205
No known party affiliation
81 Dean Street 2, Stamford , Ct 06902-6204
No known party affiliation
81 Dean Street 2, Stamford , Ct 06902-6204
No known party affiliation
85 Dean Street, Stamford , Ct 06902-6204
No known party affiliation
85 Dean Street, Stamford , Ct 06902-6204
No known party affiliation

Income

Salary: $32,556

Net Worth: $1,594,277

*This information is estimated by an algorithm and does not come from any public data. These numbers are only guesses and should not be considered to be accurate.