Nelida D Smith

Female, Age 91 Windham, Connecticut

Nelida D Smith is a 91 years old female, born on Saturday, 5th of September 1931. She will turn 92 on September 05, 2024. Our records show she currently resides at 154 Pleasant Street 11, Windham, 06226-3308 and is affiliated with the No known party affiliation. Nelida is registered to vote in Connecticut since October 2, 2019.

Overview of Nelida D Smith

Age: 91

Gender: female

Birth year: 1931

Lives in: Windham

Nelida D Smith's Voting Profile

Registered to vote since: October 2, 2019

Party Affiliation: No known party affiliation

Status: A

Precinct: 00

District: 006

Polling place: Bpo Elks 1311

Voter ID: 005078688

Congressional District: 002

House District: 049

Senate District: 029

Nelida D Smith Adress & Maps

Show Map

Thomas Gerard Adams

Neighbors for Nelida D Smith

145 Pleasant Street, Windham, 06226-3307
No known party affiliation
145 Pleasant Street, Windham, 06226-3307
No known party affiliation
151 Pleasant Street A2, Windham, 06226-3361
No known party affiliation
151 Pleasant Street 1, Windham, 06226-3307
No known party affiliation
151 Pleasant Street, Windham, 06226-3307
No known party affiliation
151 Pleasant Street, Windham, 06226-3307
No known party affiliation
151 Pleasant Street 1, Windham, 06226-0000
No known party affiliation
154 Pleasant Street, Windham, 06226-0000
No known party affiliation
154 Pleasant Street, Windham, 06226-3308
No known party affiliation
154 Pleasant Street, Windham, 06226-0000
No known party affiliation
154 Pleasant Street, Windham, 06226-3308
No known party affiliation
154 Pleasant Street, Windham, 06226-0000
No known party affiliation
154 Pleasant Street, Windham, 06226-3308
No known party affiliation
154 Pleasant Street, Windham, 06226-3308
No known party affiliation
154 Pleasant Street, Windham, 06226-3308
No known party affiliation

Income

Salary: $6,136

Net Worth: $487,450

*This information is estimated by an algorithm and does not come from any public data. These numbers are only guesses and should not be considered to be accurate.