Joann Pattersen

Female, Age 60 Windham, Connecticut

Joann Pattersen is a 60 years old female, born on Wednesday, 7th of August 1963. She will turn 61 on August 07, 2024. Our records show she currently resides at 412 Windham Road 2nd Flr, Windham, Ct 06226-3737 and is affiliated with the No known party affiliation. Joann is registered to vote in Connecticut since October 1, 2019.

Overview of Joann Pattersen

Age: 60

Gender: female

Birth year: 1964

Lives in: Windham

Joann Pattersen's Voting Profile

Registered to vote since: October 1, 2019

Party Affiliation: No known party affiliation

Status: I

Precinct: 00

District: 004

Polling place: Bpo Elks 1311

Voter ID: 005078418

Congressional District: 002

House District: 049

Senate District: 029

Joann Pattersen Adress & Maps

Thomas Gerard Adams

Neighbors for Joann Pattersen

363 Windham Road, Windham, Ct 06226-3528
No known party affiliation
377 Windham Road, Windham, Ct 06226-3528
No known party affiliation
403 Windham Road 1, Windham, Ct 06226-3736
No known party affiliation
405 Windham Road A, Windham, Ct 06226-3736
No known party affiliation
409 Windham Road, Windham, Ct 06226-3736
No known party affiliation
409 Windham Road B, Windham, Ct 06226-3736
No known party affiliation
409 Windham Road B, Windham, Ct 06226-3736
No known party affiliation
414 Windham Road 1, Windham, Ct 06226-3737
No known party affiliation
416 Windham Road, Windham, Ct 06226-3737
No known party affiliation
416 Windham Road, Windham, Ct 06226-3737
No known party affiliation
427 Windham Road A2, Windham, Ct 06226-3736
No known party affiliation
427 Windham Road 1, Windham, Ct 06226-3736
No known party affiliation
430 Windham Road, Windham, Ct 06226-3737
No known party affiliation
430 Windham Road, Windham, Ct 06226-3737
No known party affiliation
433 Windham Road, Windham, Ct 06226-3736
No known party affiliation

Income

Salary: $100,093

Net Worth: $412,636

*This information is estimated by an algorithm and does not come from any public data. These numbers are only guesses and should not be considered to be accurate.