Alex Gabriel

Male, Age 54 Stamford , Connecticut

Alex Gabriel is a 54 years old male, born on Monday, 23rd of June 1969. He will turn 55 on June 23, 2024. Our records show he currently resides at 58 Travis Avenue, Stamford , Ct 06905-4126 and is affiliated with the No known party affiliation. Alex is registered to vote in Connecticut since August 26, 2019.

Overview of Alex Gabriel

Age: 54

Gender: male

Birth year: 1969

Lives in: Stamford

Alex Gabriel's Voting Profile

Registered to vote since: August 26, 2019

Party Affiliation: No known party affiliation

Status: A

Precinct: 00

District: 012

Polling place: Stillmeadow School

Voter ID: 005065774

Congressional District: 004

House District: 144

Senate District: 036

Alex Gabriel Adress & Maps

Show Map

Thomas Gerard Adams

Neighbors for Alex Gabriel

46 Travis Avenue, Stamford , Ct 06905-4126
No known party affiliation
46 Travis Avenue, Stamford , Ct 06905-4126
No known party affiliation
50 Travis Avenue, Stamford , Ct 06905-4126
No known party affiliation
50 Travis Avenue, Stamford , Ct 06905-4126
No known party affiliation
53 Travis Avenue, Stamford , Ct 06905-4127
No known party affiliation
55 Travis Avenue, Stamford , Ct 06905-4127
No known party affiliation
55 Travis Avenue, Stamford , Ct 06905-4127
No known party affiliation
59 Travis Avenue, Stamford , Ct 06905-4127
No known party affiliation
63 Travis Avenue, Stamford , Ct 06905-4128
No known party affiliation
63 Travis Avenue 2, Stamford , Ct 06905-4128
No known party affiliation
63 Travis Avenue, Stamford , Ct 06905-4128
No known party affiliation
63 Travis Avenue 1fl, Stamford , Ct 06905-4128
No known party affiliation
65 Travis Avenue, Stamford , Ct 06905-4128
No known party affiliation
67 Travis Avenue, Stamford , Ct 06905-4128
No known party affiliation
67 Travis Avenue, Stamford , Ct 06905-4128
No known party affiliation

Income

Salary: $103,430

Net Worth: $364,673

*This information is estimated by an algorithm and does not come from any public data. These numbers are only guesses and should not be considered to be accurate.