Stephen Ozelski

Male, Age 38 Shelton, Connecticut

Stephen Ozelski is a 38 years old male, born on Thursday, 27th of June 1985. He will turn 39 on June 27, 2024. Our records show he currently resides at 20 Stendahl Drive, Shelton, Ct 06484-1635 and is affiliated with the No known party affiliation. Stephen is registered to vote in Connecticut since July 15, 2019.

Overview of Stephen Ozelski

Age: 38

Gender: male

Birth year: 1986

Lives in: Shelton

Stephen Ozelski's Voting Profile

Registered to vote since: July 15, 2019

Party Affiliation: No known party affiliation

Status: A

Precinct: 00

District: 001

Polling place: Elizabeth Shelton School

Voter ID: 005052617

Congressional District: 004

House District: 113

Senate District: 021

Stephen Ozelski Adress & Maps

Show Map

Thomas Gerard Adams

Neighbors for Stephen Ozelski

12 Stendahl Drive, Shelton, Ct 06484-1635
No known party affiliation
12 Stendahl Drive, Shelton, Ct 06484-1635
No known party affiliation
15 Stendahl Drive, Shelton, Ct 06484-1634
No known party affiliation
15 Stendahl Drive, Shelton, Ct 06484-1634
No known party affiliation
15 Stendahl Drive, Shelton, Ct 06484-1634
No known party affiliation
19 Stendahl Drive, Shelton, Ct 06484-1634
No known party affiliation
19 Stendahl Drive, Shelton, Ct 06484-1634
No known party affiliation
23 Stendahl Drive, Shelton, Ct 06484-1634
No known party affiliation
23 Stendahl Drive, Shelton, Ct 06484-1634
No known party affiliation
23 Stendahl Drive, Shelton, Ct 06484-1634
No known party affiliation
26 Stendahl Drive, Shelton, Ct 06484-1635
No known party affiliation
26 Stendahl Drive, Shelton, Ct 06484-1635
No known party affiliation
27 Stendahl Drive, Shelton, Ct 06484-1634
No known party affiliation
27 Stendahl Drive, Shelton, Ct 06484-1634
No known party affiliation
28 Stendahl Drive, Shelton, Ct 06484-1635
No known party affiliation

Income

Salary: $103,334

Net Worth: $773,035

*This information is estimated by an algorithm and does not come from any public data. These numbers are only guesses and should not be considered to be accurate.

View More Results for Ozelski