Jacqueline K Schaefer

Female, Age 22 Glastonbury, Connecticut

Jacqueline K Schaefer is a 22 years old female, born on Tuesday, 17th of April 2001. She will turn 23 on April 17, 2025. Our records show she currently resides at 8 Holmes Road, Glastonbury, Ct 06033-2906 and is affiliated with the No known party affiliation. Jacqueline is registered to vote in Connecticut since May 30, 2019. Our records show Brenda M Schaefer (56) and David Schaefer (57) as possible relatives.

Overview of Jacqueline K Schaefer

Age: 22

Gender: female

Birth year: 2001

Lives in: Glastonbury

Jacqueline K Schaefer's Voting Profile

Registered to vote since: May 30, 2019

Party Affiliation: No known party affiliation

Status: A

Precinct: 00

District: 007

Polling place: District 7 Academy Building

Voter ID: 005042093

Congressional District: 001

House District: 031

Senate District: 004

Jacqueline K Schaefer Adress & Maps

Show Map

Thomas Gerard Adams

Neighbors for Jacqueline K Schaefer

7 Holmes Road, Glastonbury, Ct 06033-2906
No known party affiliation
15 Holmes Road, Glastonbury, Ct 06033-2906
No known party affiliation
15 Holmes Road, Glastonbury, Ct 06033-2906
No known party affiliation
15 Holmes Road, Glastonbury, Ct 06033-2906
No known party affiliation
15 Holmes Road, Glastonbury, Ct 06033-2906
No known party affiliation
15 Holmes Road, Glastonbury, Ct 06033-2906
No known party affiliation
16 Holmes Road, Glastonbury, Ct 06033-0603
No known party affiliation
16 Holmes Road, Glastonbury, Ct 06033-2906
No known party affiliation
20 Holmes Road, Glastonbury, Ct 06033-2906
No known party affiliation

Related Persons

Jacqueline K Schaefer's parents, siblings, grandparents, aunts, uncles, cousins, and other extended family members.

Glastonbury, Ct
Born on: Tuesday, 20th of June 1967
Gender: Female
Glastonbury, Ct
Born on: Friday, 22nd of April 1966
Gender: Male

Income

Salary: $60,942

Net Worth: $607,998

*This information is estimated by an algorithm and does not come from any public data. These numbers are only guesses and should not be considered to be accurate.