Katelynn E Cotto

Female, Age 29 Seymour, Connecticut

Katelynn E Cotto is a 29 years old female, born on Thursday, 25th of November 1993. She will turn 30 on November 25, 2024. Our records show she currently resides at 192 Bungay Road, Seymour, Ct 06483-2410 and is affiliated with the No known party affiliation. Katelynn is registered to vote in Connecticut since April 3, 2019.

Overview of Katelynn E Cotto

Age: 29

Gender: female

Birth year: 1994

Lives in: Seymour

Katelynn E Cotto's Voting Profile

Registered to vote since: April 3, 2019

Party Affiliation: No known party affiliation

Status: A

Precinct: 00

District: 002

Polling place: District 2 Seymour Middle School

Voter ID: 005027659

Congressional District: 003

House District: 105

Senate District: 021

Katelynn E Cotto Adress & Maps

Show Map

Thomas Gerard Adams

Neighbors for Katelynn E Cotto

170 Bungay Road, Seymour, Ct 06483-2408
No known party affiliation
172 Bungay Road, Seymour, Ct 06483-2408
No known party affiliation
176 Bungay Road, Seymour, Ct 06483-2408
No known party affiliation
176 Bungay Road, Seymour, Ct 06483-2408
No known party affiliation
184 Bungay Road, Seymour, Ct 06483-2410
No known party affiliation
188 Bungay Road, Seymour, Ct 06483-2410
No known party affiliation
188 Bungay Road, Seymour, Ct 06483-2410
No known party affiliation
192 Bungay Road, Seymour, Ct 06483-2410
No known party affiliation
192 Bungay Road, Seymour, Ct 06483-2410
No known party affiliation
199 Bungay Road, Seymour, Ct 06483-2409
No known party affiliation
199 Bungay Road, Seymour, Ct 06483-2409
No known party affiliation
200 Bungay Road, Seymour, Ct 06483-2410
No known party affiliation
200 Bungay Road, Seymour, Ct 06483-2410
No known party affiliation
200 Bungay Road, Seymour, Ct 06483-2410
No known party affiliation
202 Bungay Road, Seymour, Ct 06483-2410
No known party affiliation

Income

Salary: $101,072

Net Worth: $218,043

*This information is estimated by an algorithm and does not come from any public data. These numbers are only guesses and should not be considered to be accurate.