Alisa A Cygielnik

Female, Age 50 Windham, Connecticut

Alisa A Cygielnik is a 50 years old female, born on Wednesday, 31st of May 1972. She will turn 51 on May 31, 2024. Our records show she currently resides at 370 Valley Street Fl 3, Windham, 06226-2120 and is not affiliated with any political party. Alisa is registered to vote in Connecticut since November 14, 2018.

Overview of Alisa A Cygielnik

Age: 50

Gender: female

Birth year: 1972

Lives in: Windham

Alisa A Cygielnik's Voting Profile

Registered to vote since: November 14, 2018

Party Affiliation: No known party affiliation

Status: A

Precinct: 00

District: 005

Polling place: Vfw

Voter ID: 005000286

Congressional District: 002

House District: 049

Senate District: 029

Alisa A Cygielnik Adress & Maps

Show Map

Thomas Gerard Adams

Neighbors for Alisa A Cygielnik

344 Valley Street 2, Windham, 06226-2118
No known party affiliation
349 Valley Street 1, Windham, 06226-0000
No known party affiliation
356 Valley Street 3, Windham, 06226-2120
No known party affiliation
369 Valley Street 3, Windham, 06226-2138
No known party affiliation
369 Valley Street 3, Windham, 06226-2138
No known party affiliation
369 Valley Street 2nd Flr, Windham, 06226-2138
No known party affiliation
369 Valley Street 4, Windham, 06226-2138
No known party affiliation
370 Valley Street 2, Windham, 06226-2120
No known party affiliation
370 Valley Street 3, Windham, 06226-2120
No known party affiliation
384 Valley Street Flr 2, Windham, 06226-2006
No known party affiliation
384 Valley Street 1, Windham, 06226-2006
No known party affiliation
384 Valley Street 1, Windham, 06226-2006
No known party affiliation
385 Valley Street, Windham, 06226-2005
No known party affiliation
387 Valley Street Fl 1, Windham, 06226-2005
No known party affiliation
387 Valley Street Fl 1, Windham, 06226-2005
No known party affiliation

Income

Salary: $92,157

Net Worth: $1,401,638

*This information is estimated by an algorithm and does not come from any public data. These numbers are only guesses and should not be considered to be accurate.