Yolanda M Johnson Hopkins

Female, Age 62 Ansonia, Connecticut

Yolanda M Johnson Hopkins is a 62 years old female, born on Wednesday, 2nd of March 1960. She will turn 63 on March 02, 2024. Our records show she currently resides at 86 Prospect St, Ansonia, 06401-1521 and is not affiliated with any political party. Yolanda is registered to vote in Connecticut since November 6, 2018.

Overview of Yolanda M Johnson Hopkins

Age: 62

Gender: female

Birth year: 1961

Lives in: Ansonia

Phone number: 203-502-9096

Yolanda M Johnson Hopkins's Voting Profile

Registered to vote since: November 6, 2018

Party Affiliation: No known party affiliation

Status: A

Precinct: 01

District: 002

Polling place: Ward 2 Ansonia Armory

Voter ID: 004994421

Congressional District: 003

House District: 104

Senate District: 017

Yolanda M Johnson Hopkins Adress & Maps

Show Map

Thomas Gerard Adams

Neighbors for Yolanda M Johnson Hopkins

74 Prospect St, Ansonia, 06401-1521
No known party affiliation
74 Prospect St, Ansonia, 06401-1521
No known party affiliation
75 Prospect St, Ansonia, 06401-1518
No known party affiliation
78 Prospect St, Ansonia, 06401-1521
No known party affiliation
83 Prospect St, Ansonia, 06401-1518
No known party affiliation
84 Prospect St, Ansonia, 06401-1521
No known party affiliation
84 Prospect St, Ansonia, 06401-1521
No known party affiliation
86 Prospect St, Ansonia, 06401-1521
No known party affiliation
86 Prospect St, Ansonia, 06401-1521
No known party affiliation
92 Prospect St, Ansonia, 06401-1521
No known party affiliation
92 Prospect St, Ansonia, 06401-1521
No known party affiliation
92 Prospect St, Ansonia, 06401-1521
No known party affiliation
96 Prospect St, Ansonia, 06401-1525
No known party affiliation
107 Prospect St, Ansonia, 06401-1520
No known party affiliation
107 Prospect St, Ansonia, 06401-1520
No known party affiliation

Income

Salary: $57,678

Net Worth: $812,791

*This information is estimated by an algorithm and does not come from any public data. These numbers are only guesses and should not be considered to be accurate.