Xiaobing Vanessa Chang

Female, Age 53 Stamford , Connecticut

Xiaobing Vanessa Chang is a 53 years old female, born on Tuesday, 20th of January 1970. She will turn 54 on January 20, 2024. Our records show she currently resides at 86 Fox Glen Drive, Stamford , Ct 06903-2200 and is not affiliated with any political party. Xiaobing is registered to vote in Connecticut since October 24, 2018. Our records show Yong Chang (54) as possible relative.

Overview of Xiaobing Vanessa Chang

Age: 53

Gender: female

Birth year: 1970

Lives in: Stamford

Xiaobing Vanessa Chang's Voting Profile

Registered to vote since: October 24, 2018

Party Affiliation: No known party affiliation

Status: A

Precinct: 02

District: 022

Polling place: Long Ridge Fire Company

Voter ID: 004972752

Congressional District: 004

House District: 149

Senate District: 036

Xiaobing Vanessa Chang Adress & Maps

Show Map

Thomas Gerard Adams

Neighbors for Xiaobing Vanessa Chang

53 Fox Glen Drive, Stamford , Ct 06903-2200
No known party affiliation
53 Fox Glen Drive, Stamford , Ct 06903-2200
No known party affiliation
53 Fox Glen Drive, Stamford , Ct 06903-2200
No known party affiliation
56 Fox Glen Drive, Stamford , Ct 06903-2200
No known party affiliation
77 Fox Glen Drive, Stamford , Ct 06903-2200
No known party affiliation
77 Fox Glen Drive, Stamford , Ct 06903-2200
No known party affiliation
77 Fox Glen Drive, Stamford , Ct 06903-2200
No known party affiliation
87 Fox Glen Drive, Stamford , Ct 06903-2200
No known party affiliation
87 Fox Glen Drive, Stamford , Ct 06903-2200
No known party affiliation
87 Fox Glen Drive, Stamford , Ct 06903-2200
No known party affiliation

Related Persons

Xiaobing Vanessa Chang's parents, siblings, grandparents, aunts, uncles, cousins, and other extended family members.

(54)
Stamford , Ct
Born on: Saturday, 8th of February 1969
Gender: Male

Income

Salary: $9,400

Net Worth: $991,618

*This information is estimated by an algorithm and does not come from any public data. These numbers are only guesses and should not be considered to be accurate.