Jasoda Gladys Watson

Unknown, Age 66 Waterbury , Connecticut

Jasoda Gladys Watson is a 66 years old unknown gender, born on Saturday, 15th of September 1956. This person will turn 67 on September 15, 2024. Our records show this person currently resides at 52 Jodie Circle, Waterbury , 06706-2510 and is affiliated with the No known party affiliation. Jasoda is registered to vote in Connecticut since October 12, 2018. Our records show Jonathan Watson (69) as possible relative.

Overview of Jasoda Gladys Watson

Age: 66

Gender: unknown

Birth year: 1956

Lives in: Waterbury

Phone number: 203-558-6101

Jasoda Gladys Watson's Voting Profile

Registered to vote since: October 12, 2018

Party Affiliation: No known party affiliation

Status: A

Precinct: 02

District: 071

Polling place: Gilmartin School

Voter ID: 004960914

Congressional District: 003

House District: 071

Senate District: 015

Jasoda Gladys Watson Adress & Maps

Show Map

Thomas Gerard Adams

Neighbors for Jasoda Gladys Watson

33 Jodie Circle, Waterbury , 06706-0000
No known party affiliation
38 Jodie Circle, Waterbury , 06706-2510
No known party affiliation
38 Jodie Circle, Waterbury , 06706-2510
No known party affiliation
45 Jodie Circle, Waterbury , 06706-2510
No known party affiliation
51 Jodie Circle, Waterbury , 06706-2510
No known party affiliation
51 Jodie Circle, Waterbury , 06706-2510
No known party affiliation
51 Jodie Circle, Waterbury , 06706-2510
No known party affiliation
58 Jodie Circle, Waterbury , 06706-2510
No known party affiliation
58 Jodie Circle, Waterbury , 06706-2510
No known party affiliation
58 Jodie Circle, Waterbury , 06706-2510
No known party affiliation

Related Persons

Jasoda Gladys Watson's parents, siblings, grandparents, aunts, uncles, cousins, and other extended family members.

Waterbury , Ct
Born on: Thursday, 10th of September 1953
Gender: Male

Income

Salary: $85,781

Net Worth: $696,587

*This information is estimated by an algorithm and does not come from any public data. These numbers are only guesses and should not be considered to be accurate.