Lana Jean Roebke

Female, Age 42 Enfield, Connecticut

Lana Jean Roebke is a 42 years old female, born on Sunday, 15th of June 1980. She will turn 43 on June 15, 2024. Our records show she currently resides at 2248 Bigelow Commons, Enfield, 06082-3341 and is not affiliated with any political party. Lana is registered to vote in Connecticut since August 23, 2018.

Overview of Lana Jean Roebke

Age: 42

Gender: female

Birth year: 1980

Lives in: Enfield

Lana Jean Roebke's Voting Profile

Registered to vote since: August 23, 2018

Party Affiliation: No known party affiliation

Status: I

Precinct: 00

District: 258

Polling place: Enfield Street School

Voter ID: 004936773

Congressional District: 002

House District: 058

Senate District: 007

Lana Jean Roebke Adress & Maps

Show Map

Thomas Gerard Adams

Neighbors for Lana Jean Roebke

2234 Bigelow Commons, Enfield, 06082-3341
No known party affiliation
2240 Bigelow Commons, Enfield, 06082-3341
No known party affiliation
2242 Bigelow Commons, Enfield, 06082-3341
No known party affiliation
2242 Bigelow Commons, Enfield, 06082-3341
No known party affiliation
2243 Bigelow Commons, Enfield, 06082-3341
No known party affiliation
2245 Bigelow Commons, Enfield, 06082-3341
No known party affiliation
2246 Bigelow Commons, Enfield, 06082-3341
No known party affiliation
2248 Bigelow Commons, Enfield, 06082-3341
No known party affiliation
2301 Bigelow Commons, Enfield, 06082-3342
No known party affiliation
2302 Bigelow Commons, Enfield, 06082-3342
No known party affiliation
2304 Bigelow Commons, Enfield, 06082-3342
No known party affiliation
2304 Bigelow Commons, Enfield, 06082-3342
No known party affiliation
2307 Bigelow Commons, Enfield, 06082-3342
No known party affiliation
2308 Bigelow Commons, Enfield, 06082-3342
No known party affiliation
2308 Bigelow Commons, Enfield, 06082-3342
No known party affiliation

Income

Salary: $40,098

Net Worth: $1,071,513

*This information is estimated by an algorithm and does not come from any public data. These numbers are only guesses and should not be considered to be accurate.