Lucille P Ward

Female, Age 77 Guilford , Connecticut

Lucille P Ward is a 77 years old female, born on Wednesday, 1st of May 1946. She will turn 78 on May 01, 2024. Our records show she currently resides at 10 Route 1 East, Guilford , Ct 06437-2928 and is affiliated with the No known party affiliation. Lucille is registered to vote in Connecticut since August 6, 2020.

Overview of Lucille P Ward

Age: 77

Gender: female

Birth year: 1947

Lives in: Guilford

Lucille P Ward's Voting Profile

Registered to vote since: August 6, 2020

Party Affiliation: No known party affiliation

Status: A

Precinct: 00

District: 001

Polling place: Calvin Leete School

Voter ID: 004931672

Congressional District: 003

House District: 098

Senate District: 012

Lucille P Ward Adress & Maps

Show Map

Thomas Gerard Adams

Neighbors for Lucille P Ward

10 Route 1 East, Guilford , Ct 06437-2928
No known party affiliation
10 Route 1 East, Guilford , Ct 06437-2928
No known party affiliation
10 Route 1 East, Guilford , Ct 06437-2928
No known party affiliation
10 Route 1 East, Guilford , Ct 06437-2928
No known party affiliation
10 Route 1 East, Guilford , Ct 06437-2928
No known party affiliation
10 Route 1 East, Guilford , Ct 06437-2928
No known party affiliation
10 Route 1 East, Guilford , Ct 06437-2928
No known party affiliation
10 Route 1 East, Guilford , Ct 06437-2928
No known party affiliation
10 Route 1 East, Guilford , Ct 06437-2928
No known party affiliation
10 Route 1 East, Guilford , Ct 06437-2928
No known party affiliation
10 Route 1 East, Guilford , Ct 06437-2928
No known party affiliation
10 Route 1 East, Guilford , Ct 06437-2928
No known party affiliation
10 Route 1 East, Guilford , Ct 06437-2928
No known party affiliation
10 Route 1 East, Guilford , Ct 06437-2928
No known party affiliation
10 Route 1 East, Guilford , Ct 06437-2928
No known party affiliation

Income

Salary: $38,395

Net Worth: $886,547

*This information is estimated by an algorithm and does not come from any public data. These numbers are only guesses and should not be considered to be accurate.