1. Home
  2. Cities in Connecticut
  3. 06708 Waterbury
  4. Rockwell Avenue

Kathy Ummah

Female, Age 66 Waterbury , Connecticut

Kathy Ummah is a 66 years old female, born on Monday, 4th of March 1957. She will turn 67 on March 04, 2024. Our records show she currently resides at 57 Rockwell Avenue, Waterbury , Ct 06708-1754 and is affiliated with the No known party affiliation. Kathy is registered to vote in Connecticut since July 13, 2018.

Overview of Kathy Ummah

Age: 66

Gender: female

Birth year: 1958

Lives in: Waterbury

Kathy Ummah's Voting Profile

Registered to vote since: July 13, 2018

Party Affiliation: No known party affiliation

Status: A

Precinct: 01

District: 073

Polling place: Carrington School

Voter ID: 004920065

Congressional District: 005

House District: 073

Senate District: 015

Kathy Ummah Adress & Maps

Show Map

Residential Address

57 Rockwell Avenue, Waterbury , Ct 06708-1754

Thomas Gerard Adams

Neighbors for Kathy Ummah

Elizabeth J Brown(21)
48 Rockwell Avenue, Waterbury , Ct 06708-1755
No known party affiliation
Edith K Brown(49)
48 Rockwell Avenue, Waterbury , Ct 06708-1755
No known party affiliation
Patrick T Drewry(85)
48 Rockwell Avenue, Waterbury , Ct 06708-1755
No known party affiliation
Erin K Brown(24)
48 Rockwell Avenue, Waterbury , Ct 06708-1755
No known party affiliation
Arthur R Petrucci(82)
49 Rockwell Avenue, Waterbury , Ct 06708-1754
No known party affiliation
Robert D Keating(70)
56 Rockwell Avenue, Waterbury , Ct 06708-1755
No known party affiliation
Patti A Keating(62)
56 Rockwell Avenue, Waterbury , Ct 06708-1755
No known party affiliation
Doyen A Barrett(45)
64 Rockwell Avenue, Waterbury , Ct 06708-1755
No known party affiliation
Jerry M Ranando(64)
69 Rockwell Avenue, Waterbury , Ct 06708-1754
No known party affiliation
View all neighbors on 57 Rockwell Avenue, Waterbury , Ct 06708-1754

Income

Salary: $60,699

Net Worth: $788,631

*This information is estimated by an algorithm and does not come from any public data. These numbers are only guesses and should not be considered to be accurate.