Anthony Ortizesquilin

Male, Age 31 Windham, Connecticut

Anthony Ortizesquilin is a 31 years old male, born on Saturday, 8th of August 1992. He will turn 32 on August 08, 2024. Our records show he currently resides at 84 Ash Street 4, Windham, Ct 06226-2948 and is affiliated with the No known party affiliation. Anthony is registered to vote in Connecticut since July 13, 2018.

Overview of Anthony Ortizesquilin

Age: 31

Gender: male

Birth year: 1992

Lives in: Windham

Anthony Ortizesquilin's Voting Profile

Registered to vote since: July 13, 2018

Party Affiliation: No known party affiliation

Status: I

Precinct: 00

District: 006

Polling place: Bpo Elks 1311

Voter ID: 004920020

Congressional District: 002

House District: 049

Senate District: 029

Anthony Ortizesquilin Adress & Maps

Show Map

Thomas Gerard Adams

Neighbors for Anthony Ortizesquilin

49 Ash Street, Windham, Ct 06226-3101
No known party affiliation
49 Ash Street 1, Windham, Ct 06226-3101
No known party affiliation
51 Ash Street 1b, Windham, Ct 06226-2932
No known party affiliation
52 Ash Street, Windham, Ct 06226-2932
No known party affiliation
53 Ash Street, Windham, Ct 06226-2932
No known party affiliation
53 Ash Street, Windham, Ct 06226-2932
No known party affiliation
59 Ash Street, Windham, Ct 06226-2932
No known party affiliation
84 Ash Street Apt 31, Windham, Ct 06226-2948
No known party affiliation
84 Ash Street 35, Windham, Ct 06226-2948
No known party affiliation
84 Ash Street Apt 12, Windham, Ct 06226-2948
No known party affiliation
84 Ash Street 8, Windham, Ct 06226-2948
No known party affiliation
84 Ash Street 34, Windham, Ct 06226-2948
No known party affiliation
84 Ash Street 21, Windham, Ct 06226-2948
No known party affiliation
84 Ash Street 20, Windham, Ct 06226-2944
No known party affiliation
84 Ash Street 36, Windham, Ct 06226-2948
No known party affiliation

Income

Salary: $82,090

Net Worth: $19,923

*This information is estimated by an algorithm and does not come from any public data. These numbers are only guesses and should not be considered to be accurate.