Huijun Jiang

Male, Age 37 Brookfield, Connecticut

Huijun Jiang is a 37 years old male, born on Saturday, 7th of September 1985. He will turn 38 on September 07, 2024. Our records show he currently resides at 10 Ledgewood Drive, Brookfield, 06804-3419 and is affiliated with the No known party affiliation. Huijun is registered to vote in Connecticut since July 2, 2018.

Overview of Huijun Jiang

Age: 37

Gender: male

Birth year: 1985

Lives in: Brookfield

Huijun Jiang's Voting Profile

Registered to vote since: July 2, 2018

Party Affiliation: No known party affiliation

Status: A

Precinct: 00

District: 002

Polling place: Brookfield High School

Voter ID: 004917471

Congressional District: 005

House District: 107

Senate District: 030

Huijun Jiang Adress & Maps

Show Map

Thomas Gerard Adams

Neighbors for Huijun Jiang

6 Ledgewood Drive, Brookfield, 06804-3419
No known party affiliation
6 Ledgewood Drive, Brookfield, 06804-3419
No known party affiliation
6 Ledgewood Drive, Brookfield, 06804-3419
No known party affiliation
8 Ledgewood Drive, Brookfield, 06804-3419
No known party affiliation
8 Ledgewood Drive, Brookfield, 06804-3419
No known party affiliation
8 Ledgewood Drive, Brookfield, 06804-3419
No known party affiliation
8 Ledgewood Drive, Brookfield, 06804-3419
No known party affiliation
12 Ledgewood Drive, Brookfield, 06804-3419
No known party affiliation
12 Ledgewood Drive, Brookfield, 06804-3419
No known party affiliation
12 Ledgewood Drive, Brookfield, 06804-3419
No known party affiliation
12 Ledgewood Drive, Brookfield, 06804-3419
No known party affiliation
14 Ledgewood Drive, Brookfield, 06804-3421
No known party affiliation
14 Ledgewood Drive, Brookfield, 06804-3421
No known party affiliation
16 Ledgewood Drive, Brookfield, 06804-3421
No known party affiliation
16 Ledgewood Drive, Brookfield, 06804-3421
No known party affiliation

Income

Salary: $38,048

Net Worth: $266,649

*This information is estimated by an algorithm and does not come from any public data. These numbers are only guesses and should not be considered to be accurate.