Rachelle Julia Guy

Female, Age 23 Stamford , Connecticut

Rachelle Julia Guy is a 23 years old female, born on Friday, 11th of August 2000. She will turn 24 on August 11, 2024. Our records show she currently resides at 60 Dann Drive, Stamford , Ct 06905-3501 and is affiliated with the No known party affiliation. Rachelle is registered to vote in Connecticut since May 7, 2018.

Overview of Rachelle Julia Guy

Age: 23

Gender: female

Birth year: 2000

Lives in: Stamford

Rachelle Julia Guy's Voting Profile

Registered to vote since: May 7, 2018

Party Affiliation: No known party affiliation

Status: A

Precinct: 00

District: 013

Polling place: Rippowam Middle School

Voter ID: 004900045

Congressional District: 004

House District: 144

Senate District: 027

Rachelle Julia Guy Adress & Maps

Show Map

Thomas Gerard Adams

Neighbors for Rachelle Julia Guy

49 Dann Drive, Stamford , Ct 06905-3502
No known party affiliation
49 Dann Drive, Stamford , Ct 06905-3502
No known party affiliation
54 Dann Drive, Stamford , Ct 06905-3501
No known party affiliation
54 Dann Drive, Stamford , Ct 06905-3501
No known party affiliation
54 Dann Drive, Stamford , Ct 06905-3501
No known party affiliation
54 Dann Drive, Stamford , Ct 06905-3501
No known party affiliation
54 Dann Drive, Stamford , Ct 06905-3501
No known party affiliation
60 Dann Drive, Stamford , Ct 06905-3501
No known party affiliation
61 Dann Drive, Stamford , Ct 06905-3502
No known party affiliation
61 Dann Drive, Stamford , Ct 06905-3502
No known party affiliation
66 Dann Drive, Stamford , Ct 06905-3501
No known party affiliation
66 Dann Drive, Stamford , Ct 06905-3501
No known party affiliation
67 Dann Drive, Stamford , Ct 06905-3502
No known party affiliation
72 Dann Drive, Stamford , Ct 06905-3501
No known party affiliation
72 Dann Drive, Stamford , Ct 06905-3501
No known party affiliation

Income

Salary: $30,292

Net Worth: $289,106

*This information is estimated by an algorithm and does not come from any public data. These numbers are only guesses and should not be considered to be accurate.