Noemi Atlixquenojuarez

Female, Age 33 Windham, Connecticut

Noemi Atlixquenojuarez is a 33 years old female, born on Tuesday, 10th of July 1990. She will turn 34 on July 10, 2024. Our records show she currently resides at 142 Oxbow Drive, Windham, Ct 06226-3651 and is not affiliated with any political party. Noemi is registered to vote in Connecticut since January 9, 2018.

Overview of Noemi Atlixquenojuarez

Age: 33

Gender: female

Birth year: 1990

Lives in: Windham

Noemi Atlixquenojuarez's Voting Profile

Registered to vote since: January 9, 2018

Party Affiliation: No known party affiliation

Status: A

Precinct: 00

District: 004

Polling place: Bpo Elks 1311

Voter ID: 004873570

Congressional District: 002

House District: 049

Senate District: 029

Noemi Atlixquenojuarez Adress & Maps

Show Map

Thomas Gerard Adams

Neighbors for Noemi Atlixquenojuarez

126 Oxbow Drive, Windham, Ct 06226-3651
No known party affiliation
126 Oxbow Drive, Windham, Ct 06226-3651
No known party affiliation
134 Oxbow Drive, Windham, Ct 06226-3651
No known party affiliation
134 Oxbow Drive, Windham, Ct 06226-3651
No known party affiliation
137 Oxbow Drive, Windham, Ct 06226-3626
No known party affiliation
137 Oxbow Drive, Windham, Ct 06226-3626
No known party affiliation
137 Oxbow Drive, Windham, Ct 06226-3626
No known party affiliation
147 Oxbow Drive, Windham, Ct 06226-0000
No known party affiliation
147 Oxbow Drive, Windham, Ct 06226-3626
No known party affiliation
147 Oxbow Drive, Windham, Ct 06226-3626
No known party affiliation
150 Oxbow Drive, Windham, Ct 06226-3651
No known party affiliation
155 Oxbow Drive, Windham, Ct 06226-3626
No known party affiliation
155 Oxbow Drive, Windham, Ct 06226-0000
No known party affiliation
158 Oxbow Drive, Windham, Ct 06226-3651
No known party affiliation
158 Oxbow Drive, Windham, Ct 06226-3651
No known party affiliation

Income

Salary: $41,792

Net Worth: $739,820

*This information is estimated by an algorithm and does not come from any public data. These numbers are only guesses and should not be considered to be accurate.