Raymond Weaver

Male, Age 102 Waterbury , Connecticut

Raymond Weaver is a 102 years old male, born on Wednesday, 19th of May 1920. He will turn 103 on May 19, 2025. Our records show he currently resides at 133 Griggs Street, Waterbury , 06704-3127 and is not affiliated with any political party. Raymond is registered to vote in Connecticut since August 21, 2017.

Overview of Raymond Weaver

Age: 102

Gender: male

Birth year: 1920

Lives in: Waterbury

Raymond Weaver's Voting Profile

Registered to vote since: August 21, 2017

Party Affiliation: No known party affiliation

Status: A

Precinct: 02

District: 072

Polling place: Reed School

Voter ID: 004842483

Congressional District: 005

House District: 072

Senate District: 015

Raymond Weaver Adress & Maps

Show Map

Thomas Gerard Adams

Neighbors for Raymond Weaver

129 Griggs Street 2, Waterbury , 06704-3127
No known party affiliation
129 Griggs Street 1, Waterbury , 06704-3127
No known party affiliation
129 Griggs Street, Waterbury , 06704-3127
No known party affiliation
129 Griggs Street, Waterbury , 06704-3127
No known party affiliation
129 Griggs Street, Waterbury , 06704-3127
No known party affiliation
129 Griggs Street, Waterbury , 06704-3127
No known party affiliation
129 Griggs Street, Waterbury , 06704-3127
No known party affiliation
133 Griggs Street 2, Waterbury , 06704-3127
No known party affiliation
133 Griggs Street 2, Waterbury , 06704-3127
No known party affiliation
133 Griggs Street, Waterbury , 06704-3127
No known party affiliation
133 Griggs Street 2, Waterbury , 06704-3127
No known party affiliation
133 Griggs Street, Waterbury , 06704-3127
No known party affiliation
133 Griggs Street 2, Waterbury , 06704-3127
No known party affiliation
134 Griggs Street 2, Waterbury , 06704-3110
No known party affiliation
136 Griggs Street 1, Waterbury , 06704-3110
No known party affiliation

Income

Salary: $86,664

Net Worth: $507,680

*This information is estimated by an algorithm and does not come from any public data. These numbers are only guesses and should not be considered to be accurate.