David Michael Boxer

Male, Age 41 Stamford , Connecticut

David Michael Boxer is a 41 years old male, born on Friday, 5th of February 1982. He will turn 42 on February 05, 2024. Our records show he currently resides at 26 Alton Road, Stamford , Ct 06906-1128 and is affiliated with the No known party affiliation. David is registered to vote in Connecticut since July 13, 2017.

Overview of David Michael Boxer

Age: 41

Gender: male

Birth year: 1982

Lives in: Stamford

David Michael Boxer's Voting Profile

Registered to vote since: July 13, 2017

Party Affiliation: No known party affiliation

Status: A

Precinct: 00

District: 014

Polling place: Dolan Middle School

Voter ID: 004832740

Congressional District: 004

House District: 144

Senate District: 027

David Michael Boxer Adress & Maps

Show Map

Thomas Gerard Adams

Neighbors for David Michael Boxer

14 Alton Road, Stamford , Ct 06906-1128
No known party affiliation
17 Alton Road, Stamford , Ct 06906-1129
No known party affiliation
17 Alton Road, Stamford , Ct 06906-1129
No known party affiliation
20 Alton Road, Stamford , Ct 06906-1128
No known party affiliation
20 Alton Road, Stamford , Ct 06906-1128
No known party affiliation
23 Alton Road, Stamford , Ct 06906-1129
No known party affiliation
23 Alton Road, Stamford , Ct 06906-1129
No known party affiliation
29 Alton Road, Stamford , Ct 06906-1129
No known party affiliation
32 Alton Road, Stamford , Ct 06906-1128
No known party affiliation
32 Alton Road, Stamford , Ct 06906-1128
No known party affiliation
35 Alton Road, Stamford , Ct 06906-1129
No known party affiliation
35 Alton Road, Stamford , Ct 06906-1129
No known party affiliation
36 Alton Road, Stamford , Ct 06906-1128
No known party affiliation
36 Alton Road, Stamford , Ct 06906-1128
No known party affiliation
36 Alton Road, Stamford , Ct 06906-1128
No known party affiliation

Income

Salary: $109,956

Net Worth: $1,028,456

*This information is estimated by an algorithm and does not come from any public data. These numbers are only guesses and should not be considered to be accurate.