Anibal Rosa

Male, Age 44 Hartford , Connecticut

Anibal Rosa is a 44 years old male, born on Monday, 5th of November 1979. He will turn 45 on November 05, 2024. Our records show he currently resides at 31 Gilman Street 1fl, Hartford , Ct 06114-2533 and is not affiliated with any political party. Anibal is registered to vote in Connecticut since April 26, 2017.

Overview of Anibal Rosa

Age: 44

Gender: male

Birth year: 1980

Lives in: Hartford

Anibal Rosa's Voting Profile

Registered to vote since: April 26, 2017

Party Affiliation: No known party affiliation

Status: I

Precinct: 00

District: 018

Polling place: Metzner Center

Voter ID: 004815362

Congressional District: 001

House District: 006

Senate District: 001

Anibal Rosa Adress & Maps

Show Map

Thomas Gerard Adams

Neighbors for Anibal Rosa

25 Gilman Street 1fl, Hartford , Ct 06114-2533
No known party affiliation
25 Gilman Street 1fl, Hartford , Ct 06114-2533
No known party affiliation
27 Gilman Street, Hartford , Ct 06114-2533
No known party affiliation
27 Gilman Street, Hartford , Ct 06114-2533
No known party affiliation
27 Gilman Street, Hartford , Ct 06114-2533
No known party affiliation
27 Gilman Street, Hartford , Ct 06114-2533
No known party affiliation
28 Gilman Street, Hartford , Ct 06114-2532
No known party affiliation
32 Gilman Street, Hartford , Ct 06114-2532
No known party affiliation
35 Gilman Street, Hartford , Ct 06114-2533
No known party affiliation
35 Gilman Street, Hartford , Ct 06114-2533
No known party affiliation
37 Gilman Street, Hartford , Ct 06114-2533
No known party affiliation
37 Gilman Street, Hartford , Ct 06114-2533
No known party affiliation
38 Gilman Street, Hartford , Ct 06114-2532
No known party affiliation
41 Gilman Street, Hartford , Ct 06114-2533
No known party affiliation
41 Gilman Street, Hartford , Ct 06114-2533
No known party affiliation

Income

Salary: $89,010

Net Worth: $944,493

*This information is estimated by an algorithm and does not come from any public data. These numbers are only guesses and should not be considered to be accurate.