Damaris Marie Jackson

Female, Age 23 Bristol, Connecticut

Damaris Marie Jackson is a 23 years old female, born on Friday, 28th of May 1999. She will turn 24 on May 28, 2025. Our records show she currently resides at 145 Shawn Drive B5, Bristol, 06010-2778 and is affiliated with the No known party affiliation. Damaris is registered to vote in Connecticut since April 3, 2017.

Overview of Damaris Marie Jackson

Age: 23

Gender: female

Birth year: 1999

Lives in: Bristol

Damaris Marie Jackson's Voting Profile

Registered to vote since: April 3, 2017

Party Affiliation: No known party affiliation

Status: A

Precinct: 01

District: 077

Polling place: Edgewood School

Voter ID: 004811064

Congressional District: 001

House District: 077

Senate District: 031

Damaris Marie Jackson Adress & Maps

Show Map

Thomas Gerard Adams

Neighbors for Damaris Marie Jackson

135 Shawn Drive E7, Bristol, 06010-2797
No known party affiliation
135 Shawn Drive P28, Bristol, 06010-2797
No known party affiliation
135 Shawn Drive K17, Bristol, 06010-2797
No known party affiliation
135 Shawn Drive C3, Bristol, 06010-2797
No known party affiliation
135 Shawn Drive A1, Bristol, 06010-2797
No known party affiliation
135 Shawn Drive A1, Bristol, 06010-2797
No known party affiliation
135 Shawn Drive Q32, Bristol, 06010-2797
No known party affiliation
145 Shawn Drive 5, Bristol, 06010-2778
No known party affiliation
145 Shawn Drive C6, Bristol, 06010-2778
No known party affiliation
145 Shawn Drive A1, Bristol, 06010-2778
No known party affiliation
145 Shawn Drive 8, Bristol, 06010-2778
No known party affiliation
145 Shawn Drive A4, Bristol, 06010-2778
No known party affiliation
145 Shawn Drive D7, Bristol, 06010-2778
No known party affiliation
145 Shawn Drive 11, Bristol, 06010-2778
No known party affiliation
145 Shawn Drive A3, Bristol, 06010-2778
No known party affiliation

Income

Salary: $60,397

Net Worth: $576,175

*This information is estimated by an algorithm and does not come from any public data. These numbers are only guesses and should not be considered to be accurate.