Annalisa Nash

Female, Age 56 Greenwich , Connecticut

Annalisa Nash is a 56 years old female, born on Sunday, 4th of June 1967. She will turn 57 on June 04, 2024. Our records show she currently resides at 10 Tyler Lane, Greenwich , Ct 06878-1815 and is not affiliated with any political party. Annalisa is registered to vote in Connecticut since January 31, 2017.

Overview of Annalisa Nash

Age: 56

Gender: female

Birth year: 1968

Lives in: Greenwich

Phone number: 203-637-0241

Annalisa Nash's Voting Profile

Registered to vote since: January 31, 2017

Party Affiliation: No known party affiliation

Status: A

Precinct: 01

District: 005

Polling place: Riverside School 5a

Voter ID: 004799953

Congressional District: 004

House District: 151

Senate District: 036

Annalisa Nash Adress & Maps

Show Map

Thomas Gerard Adams

Neighbors for Annalisa Nash

4 Tyler Lane, Greenwich , Ct 06878-1815
No known party affiliation
6 Tyler Lane, Greenwich , Ct 06878-1815
No known party affiliation
6 Tyler Lane, Greenwich , Ct 06878-1815
No known party affiliation
7 Tyler Lane, Greenwich , Ct 06878-1815
No known party affiliation
7 Tyler Lane, Greenwich , Ct 06878-1815
No known party affiliation
9 Tyler Lane, Greenwich , Ct 06878-1815
No known party affiliation
9 Tyler Lane, Greenwich , Ct 06878-1815
No known party affiliation
10 Tyler Lane, Greenwich , Ct 06878-1815
No known party affiliation
10 Tyler Lane, Greenwich , Ct 06878-1815
No known party affiliation
11 Tyler Lane, Greenwich , Ct 06878-1815
No known party affiliation
11 Tyler Lane, Greenwich , Ct 06878-1815
No known party affiliation
12 Tyler Lane, Greenwich , Ct 06878-1815
No known party affiliation
12 Tyler Lane, Greenwich , Ct 06878-1815
No known party affiliation
14 Tyler Lane, Greenwich , Ct 06878-1815
No known party affiliation
14 Tyler Lane, Greenwich , Ct 06878-1815
No known party affiliation

Income

Salary: $20,372

Net Worth: $1,193,830

*This information is estimated by an algorithm and does not come from any public data. These numbers are only guesses and should not be considered to be accurate.