Alyssa Jean Darling

Female, Age 29 East Haven , Connecticut

Alyssa Jean Darling is a 29 years old female, born on Friday, 14th of January 1994. She will turn 30 on January 14, 2024. Our records show she currently resides at 100 Bradley Avenue 2, East Haven , Ct 06512-2942 and is not affiliated with any political party. Alyssa is registered to vote in Connecticut since November 8, 2016.

Overview of Alyssa Jean Darling

Age: 29

Gender: female

Birth year: 1994

Lives in: East Haven

Phone number: 203-980-6724

Alyssa Jean Darling's Voting Profile

Registered to vote since: November 8, 2016

Party Affiliation: No known party affiliation

Status: A

Precinct: 00

District: 004

Polling place: Overbrook School 4

Voter ID: 004783565

Congressional District: 003

House District: 099

Senate District: 034

Alyssa Jean Darling Adress & Maps

Thomas Gerard Adams

Neighbors for Alyssa Jean Darling

94 Bradley Avenue 1sr Fl, East Haven , Ct 06512-2942
No known party affiliation
94 Bradley Avenue 2, East Haven , Ct 06512-2942
No known party affiliation
95 Bradley Avenue, East Haven , Ct 06512-2943
No known party affiliation
95 Bradley Avenue, East Haven , Ct 06512-2943
No known party affiliation
95 Bradley Avenue, East Haven , Ct 06512-2943
No known party affiliation
99 Bradley Avenue, East Haven , Ct 06512-2943
No known party affiliation
99 Bradley Avenue, East Haven , Ct 06512-2943
No known party affiliation
100 Bradley Avenue, East Haven , Ct 06512-2942
No known party affiliation
100 Bradley Avenue 2nd Fl, East Haven , Ct 06512-2942
No known party affiliation
103 Bradley Avenue, East Haven , Ct 06512-2943
No known party affiliation
103 Bradley Avenue, East Haven , Ct 06512-2943
No known party affiliation
106 Bradley Avenue, East Haven , Ct 06512-2942
No known party affiliation
106 Bradley Avenue, East Haven , Ct 06512-2942
No known party affiliation

Income

Salary: $11,112

Net Worth: $454,591

*This information is estimated by an algorithm and does not come from any public data. These numbers are only guesses and should not be considered to be accurate.