Ghazala Jaffry

Female, Age 48 Enfield, Connecticut

Ghazala Jaffry is a 48 years old female, born on Tuesday, 26th of August 1975. She will turn 49 on August 26, 2024. Our records show she currently resides at 208 Hazard Avenue, Enfield, Ct 06082-4525 and is not affiliated with any political party. Ghazala is registered to vote in Connecticut since November 8, 2016.

Overview of Ghazala Jaffry

Age: 48

Gender: female

Birth year: 1975

Lives in: Enfield

Ghazala Jaffry's Voting Profile

Registered to vote since: November 8, 2016

Party Affiliation: No known party affiliation

Status: A

Precinct: 00

District: 359

Polling place: Enfield Municipal Annex

Voter ID: 004777180

Congressional District: 002

House District: 059

Senate District: 007

Ghazala Jaffry Adress & Maps

Show Map

Thomas Gerard Adams

Neighbors for Ghazala Jaffry

204 Hazard Avenue, Enfield, Ct 06082-4525
No known party affiliation
204 Hazard Avenue, Enfield, Ct 06082-4525
No known party affiliation
206 Hazard Avenue, Enfield, Ct 06082-4525
No known party affiliation
206 Hazard Avenue, Enfield, Ct 06082-4525
No known party affiliation
207 Hazard Avenue, Enfield, Ct 06082-4522
No known party affiliation
207 Hazard Avenue, Enfield, Ct 06082-4522
No known party affiliation
207 Hazard Avenue, Enfield, Ct 06082-4522
No known party affiliation
209 Hazard Avenue, Enfield, Ct 06082-4522
No known party affiliation
210 Hazard Avenue, Enfield, Ct 06082-4525
No known party affiliation
211 Hazard Avenue, Enfield, Ct 06082-4522
No known party affiliation
212 Hazard Avenue, Enfield, Ct 06082-4525
No known party affiliation
212 Hazard Avenue, Enfield, Ct 06082-4525
No known party affiliation
213 Hazard Avenue, Enfield, Ct 06082-4524
No known party affiliation
214 Hazard Avenue, Enfield, Ct 06082-4525
No known party affiliation
214 Hazard Avenue, Enfield, Ct 06082-4525
No known party affiliation

Income

Salary: $14,136

Net Worth: $1,259,779

*This information is estimated by an algorithm and does not come from any public data. These numbers are only guesses and should not be considered to be accurate.