Valerie Jean Bhat

Male, Age 65 Windham, Connecticut

Valerie Jean Bhat is a 65 years old male, born on Friday, 2nd of May 1958. He will turn 66 on May 02, 2025. Our records show he currently resides at 89 Windham Road 1, Windham, Ct 06226-3523 and is affiliated with the No known party affiliation. Valerie is registered to vote in Connecticut since November 8, 2016.

Overview of Valerie Jean Bhat

Age: 65

Gender: male

Birth year: 1958

Lives in: Windham

Valerie Jean Bhat's Voting Profile

Registered to vote since: November 8, 2016

Party Affiliation: No known party affiliation

Status: A

Precinct: 00

District: 006

Polling place: Bpo Elks 1311

Voter ID: 004776514

Congressional District: 002

House District: 049

Senate District: 029

Valerie Jean Bhat Adress & Maps

Show Map

Thomas Gerard Adams

Neighbors for Valerie Jean Bhat

77 Windham Road, Windham, Ct 06226-3523
No known party affiliation
83 Windham Road, Windham, Ct 06226-3555
No known party affiliation
87 Windham Road, Windham, Ct 06226-3523
No known party affiliation
87 Windham Road, Windham, Ct 06226-3523
No known party affiliation
87 Windham Road, Windham, Ct 06226-3523
No known party affiliation
87 Windham Road, Windham, Ct 06226-3523
No known party affiliation
88 Windham Road, Windham, Ct 06226-0000
No known party affiliation
89 Windham Road 6, Windham, Ct 06226-3523
No known party affiliation
89 Windham Road A1, Windham, Ct 06226-3523
No known party affiliation
89 Windham Road Apt 1, Windham, Ct 06226-3523
No known party affiliation
89 Windham Road Apt 3, Windham, Ct 06226-3523
No known party affiliation
100 Windham Road, Windham, Ct 06226-3524
No known party affiliation
103 Windham Road, Windham, Ct 06226-0000
No known party affiliation
103 Windham Road, Windham, Ct 06226-3523
No known party affiliation
103 Windham Road, Windham, Ct 06226-3523
No known party affiliation

Income

Salary: $101,794

Net Worth: $848,424

*This information is estimated by an algorithm and does not come from any public data. These numbers are only guesses and should not be considered to be accurate.