Meschac Alexis

Female, Age 27 Windham, Connecticut

Meschac Alexis is a 27 years old female, born on Monday, 2nd of December 1996. She will turn 28 on December 02, 2024. Our records show she currently resides at 83 Windham Street, Windham, Ct 06226-2211 and is affiliated with the No known party affiliation. Meschac is registered to vote in Connecticut since November 8, 2016.

Overview of Meschac Alexis

Age: 27

Gender: female

Birth year: 1996

Lives in: Windham

Meschac Alexis's Voting Profile

Registered to vote since: November 8, 2016

Party Affiliation: No known party affiliation

Status: I

Precinct: 00

District: 005

Polling place: Vfw

Voter ID: 004770558

Congressional District: 002

House District: 049

Senate District: 029

Meschac Alexis Adress & Maps

Show Map

Thomas Gerard Adams

Neighbors for Meschac Alexis

66 Windham Street, Windham, Ct 06226-2227
No known party affiliation
66 Windham Street 3, Windham, Ct 06226-2227
No known party affiliation
66 Windham Street 8, Windham, Ct 06226-2227
No known party affiliation
66 Windham Street, Windham, Ct 06226
No known party affiliation
82 Windham Street, Windham, Ct 06226-2212
No known party affiliation
82 Windham Street, Windham, Ct 06226-2212
No known party affiliation
82 Windham Street, Windham, Ct 06226-2212
No known party affiliation
83 Windham Street, Windham, Ct 06226-2211
No known party affiliation
83 Windham Street, Windham, Ct 06226-2211
No known party affiliation
83 Windham Street, Windham, Ct 06226-2211
No known party affiliation
83 Windham Street Const Ha, Windham, Ct 06226-2211
No known party affiliation
83 Windham Street, Windham, Ct 06226-2211
No known party affiliation
83 Windham Street, Windham, Ct 06226-2211
No known party affiliation
83 Windham Street, Windham, Ct 06226-2211
No known party affiliation
83 Windham Street, Windham, Ct 06226-2211
No known party affiliation

Income

Salary: $96,289

Net Worth: $703,483

*This information is estimated by an algorithm and does not come from any public data. These numbers are only guesses and should not be considered to be accurate.