Loriann Watson

Female, Age 58 Windham, Connecticut

Loriann Watson is a 58 years old female, born on Monday, 27th of January 1964. She will turn 59 on January 27, 2025. Our records show she currently resides at 97 Friendship Street, Windham, 06226-1413 and is affiliated with the No known party affiliation. Loriann is registered to vote in Connecticut since November 8, 2016.

Overview of Loriann Watson

Age: 58

Gender: female

Birth year: 1964

Lives in: Windham

Loriann Watson's Voting Profile

Registered to vote since: November 8, 2016

Party Affiliation: No known party affiliation

Status: A

Precinct: 00

District: 005

Polling place: Vfw

Voter ID: 004763959

Congressional District: 002

House District: 049

Senate District: 029

Loriann Watson Adress & Maps

Show Map

Thomas Gerard Adams

Neighbors for Loriann Watson

68 Friendship Street, Windham, 06226-1412
No known party affiliation
71 Friendship Street, Windham, 06226-1411
No known party affiliation
74 Friendship Street, Windham, 06226-1412
No known party affiliation
83 Friendship Street, Windham, 06226-1411
No known party affiliation
83 Friendship Street, Windham, 06226-1411
No known party affiliation
92 Friendship Street, Windham, 06226-1412
No known party affiliation
92 Friendship Street, Windham, 06226-1412
No known party affiliation
97 Friendship Street, Windham, 06226-1413
No known party affiliation
98 Friendship Street, Windham, 06226-0000
No known party affiliation
98 Friendship Street, Windham, 06226-1414
No known party affiliation
98 Friendship Street, Windham, 06226-1414
No known party affiliation
98 Friendship Street, Windham, 06226-1414
No known party affiliation
104 Friendship Street, Windham, 06226-1414
No known party affiliation
104 Friendship Street, Windham, 06226-1414
No known party affiliation
108 Friendship Street, Windham, 06226-0000
No known party affiliation

Income

Salary: $41,421

Net Worth: $1,044,051

*This information is estimated by an algorithm and does not come from any public data. These numbers are only guesses and should not be considered to be accurate.