1. Home
  2. Cities in Connecticut
  3. 06437 Guilford
  4. Barker Hill Drive

Jackson Mark

Male, Age 48 Guilford , Connecticut

Jackson Mark is a 48 years old male, born on Saturday, 3rd of November 1973. He will turn 49 on November 03, 2024. Our records show he currently resides at 170 Barker Hill Drive, Guilford , 06437-2351 and is affiliated with the No known party affiliation. Jackson is registered to vote in Connecticut since November 8, 2016.

Overview of Jackson Mark

Age: 48

Gender: male

Birth year: 1974

Lives in: Guilford

Jackson Mark's Voting Profile

Registered to vote since: November 8, 2016

Party Affiliation: No known party affiliation

Status: A

Precinct: 00

District: 005

Polling place: A.w. Cox School

Voter ID: 004762117

Congressional District: 003

House District: 098

Senate District: 012

Jackson Mark Adress & Maps

Show Map

Residential Address

170 Barker Hill Drive, Guilford , 06437-2351

Thomas Gerard Adams

Neighbors for Jackson Mark

Gillian Marie Murray(22)
150 Barker Hill Drive, Guilford , 06437-2351
No known party affiliation
Tammy M Murray(49)
150 Barker Hill Drive, Guilford , 06437-2351
No known party affiliation
Timothy J Ricigliano(32)
157 Barker Hill Drive, Guilford , 06437-2352
No known party affiliation
Joseph Ricigliano(79)
157 Barker Hill Drive, Guilford , 06437-2352
No known party affiliation
Joseph Daniel Ricigliano(35)
157 Barker Hill Drive, Guilford , 06437-2352
No known party affiliation
Harry B Hodge(84)
169 Barker Hill Drive, Guilford , 06437-2352
No known party affiliation
Gaye G Hodge(78)
169 Barker Hill Drive, Guilford , 06437-2352
No known party affiliation
Mark Jackson(48)
170 Barker Hill Drive, Guilford , 06437-2351
No known party affiliation
Amy J Jackson(48)
170 Barker Hill Drive, Guilford , 06437-2351
No known party affiliation
View all neighbors on 170 Barker Hill Drive, Guilford , 06437-2351

Income

Salary: $98,082

Net Worth: $536,148

*This information is estimated by an algorithm and does not come from any public data. These numbers are only guesses and should not be considered to be accurate.