Jacy T Barberedwards

Male, Age 41 Bloomfield, Connecticut

Jacy T Barberedwards is a 41 years old male, born on Monday, 29th of March 1982. He will turn 42 on March 29, 2025. Our records show he currently resides at 28 Valley View Drive, Bloomfield, Ct 06002-1632 and is affiliated with the No known party affiliation. Jacy is registered to vote in Connecticut since November 1, 2016.

Overview of Jacy T Barberedwards

Age: 41

Gender: male

Birth year: 1982

Lives in: Bloomfield

Phone number: 240-422-0679

Jacy T Barberedwards's Voting Profile

Registered to vote since: November 1, 2016

Party Affiliation: No known party affiliation

Status: A

Precinct: 00

District: 002

Polling place: Bloomfield High School

Voter ID: 004740753

Congressional District: 001

House District: 015

Senate District: 002

Jacy T Barberedwards Adress & Maps

Thomas Gerard Adams

Neighbors for Jacy T Barberedwards

23 Valley View Drive, Bloomfield, Ct 06002-1631
No known party affiliation
23 Valley View Drive, Bloomfield, Ct 06002-1631
No known party affiliation
25 Valley View Drive, Bloomfield, Ct 06002-1631
No known party affiliation
25 Valley View Drive, Bloomfield, Ct 06002-1631
No known party affiliation
26 Valley View Drive, Bloomfield, Ct 06002-1632
No known party affiliation
27 Valley View Drive, Bloomfield, Ct 06002-1631
No known party affiliation
27 Valley View Drive, Bloomfield, Ct 06002-1631
No known party affiliation
29 Valley View Drive, Bloomfield, Ct 06002-1631
No known party affiliation
29 Valley View Drive, Bloomfield, Ct 06002-1631
No known party affiliation
31 Valley View Drive, Bloomfield, Ct 06002-1631
No known party affiliation
31 Valley View Drive, Bloomfield, Ct 06002-1631
No known party affiliation
33 Valley View Drive, Bloomfield, Ct 06002-1631
No known party affiliation
33 Valley View Drive, Bloomfield, Ct 06002-1631
No known party affiliation

Income

Salary: $61,277

Net Worth: $722,160

*This information is estimated by an algorithm and does not come from any public data. These numbers are only guesses and should not be considered to be accurate.