Laura J Castoe

Female, Age 61 Bristol, Connecticut

Laura J Castoe is a 61 years old female, born on Thursday, 13th of December 1962. She will turn 62 on December 13, 2025. Our records show she currently resides at 26 Lawson Street, Bristol, Ct 06010-5666 and is affiliated with the No known party affiliation. Laura is registered to vote in Connecticut since October 28, 2016.

Overview of Laura J Castoe

Age: 61

Gender: female

Birth year: 1963

Lives in: Bristol

Laura J Castoe's Voting Profile

Registered to vote since: October 28, 2016

Party Affiliation: No known party affiliation

Status: A

Precinct: 02

District: 078

Polling place: West Bristol School

Voter ID: 004729842

Congressional District: 001

House District: 078

Senate District: 031

Laura J Castoe Adress & Maps

Show Map

Thomas Gerard Adams

Neighbors for Laura J Castoe

5 Lawson Street, Bristol, Ct 06010-5667
No known party affiliation
15 Lawson Street, Bristol, Ct 06010-5667
No known party affiliation
16 Lawson Street, Bristol, Ct 06010-5666
No known party affiliation
21 Lawson Street, Bristol, Ct 06010-5667
No known party affiliation
21 Lawson Street, Bristol, Ct 06010-5667
No known party affiliation
21 Lawson Street, Bristol, Ct 06010-5667
No known party affiliation
25 Lawson Street, Bristol, Ct 06010-5667
No known party affiliation
26 Lawson Street, Bristol, Ct 06010-5666
No known party affiliation
27 Lawson Street 2, Bristol, Ct 06010-5667
No known party affiliation
32 Lawson Street, Bristol, Ct 06010-5666
No known party affiliation
33 Lawson Street, Bristol, Ct 06010-5667
No known party affiliation
36 Lawson Street, Bristol, Ct 06010-5666
No known party affiliation
36 Lawson Street, Bristol, Ct 06010-5666
No known party affiliation
43 Lawson Street, Bristol, Ct 06010-5667
No known party affiliation
48 Lawson Street, Bristol, Ct 06010-5666
No known party affiliation

Income

Salary: $20,990

Net Worth: $1,167,185

*This information is estimated by an algorithm and does not come from any public data. These numbers are only guesses and should not be considered to be accurate.