Donald J Judd

Male, Age 65 Hamden , Connecticut

Donald J Judd is a 65 years old male, born on Tuesday, 17th of December 1957. He will turn 66 on December 17, 2025. Our records show he currently resides at 15 Pelham Avenue, Hamden , Ct 06518-2522 and is not affiliated with any political party. Donald is registered to vote in Connecticut since October 26, 2016.

Overview of Donald J Judd

Age: 65

Gender: male

Birth year: 1958

Lives in: Hamden

Phone number: 203-494-8213

Donald J Judd's Voting Profile

Registered to vote since: October 26, 2016

Party Affiliation: No known party affiliation

Status: A

Precinct: 00

District: 001

Polling place: Miller Library

Voter ID: 004724517

Congressional District: 003

House District: 088

Senate District: 011

Donald J Judd Adress & Maps

Show Map

Thomas Gerard Adams

Neighbors for Donald J Judd

4 Pelham Avenue 2fl, Hamden , Ct 06518-2523
No known party affiliation
4 Pelham Avenue, Hamden , Ct 06518-2523
No known party affiliation
8 Pelham Avenue, Hamden , Ct 06518-2523
No known party affiliation
8 Pelham Avenue, Hamden , Ct 06518-2523
No known party affiliation
12 Pelham Avenue, Hamden , Ct 06518-2523
No known party affiliation
15 Pelham Avenue, Hamden , Ct 06518-2522
No known party affiliation
27 Pelham Avenue, Hamden , Ct 06518-2522
No known party affiliation
33 Pelham Avenue, Hamden , Ct 06518-2522
No known party affiliation
67 Pelham Avenue, Hamden , Ct 06518-2522
No known party affiliation
67 Pelham Avenue, Hamden , Ct 06518-2522
No known party affiliation
67 Pelham Avenue, Hamden , Ct 06518-2522
No known party affiliation
85 Pelham Avenue, Hamden , Ct 06518-2522
No known party affiliation
85 Pelham Avenue, Hamden , Ct 06518-2522
No known party affiliation
115 Pelham Avenue, Hamden , Ct 06518-2524
No known party affiliation
115 Pelham Avenue, Hamden , Ct 06518-2524
No known party affiliation

Income

Salary: $81,395

Net Worth: $257,321

*This information is estimated by an algorithm and does not come from any public data. These numbers are only guesses and should not be considered to be accurate.