Julie R Babcock

Female, Age 69 Ledyard, Connecticut

Julie R Babcock is a 69 years old female, born on Tuesday, 13th of October 1953. She will turn 70 on October 13, 2025. Our records show she currently resides at 3 Winfield Way, Ledyard, Ct 06339-1549 and is not affiliated with any political party. Julie is registered to vote in Connecticut since October 25, 2016.

Overview of Julie R Babcock

Age: 69

Gender: female

Birth year: 1954

Lives in: Ledyard

Phone number: 860-235-5579

Julie R Babcock's Voting Profile

Registered to vote since: October 25, 2016

Party Affiliation: No known party affiliation

Status: A

Precinct: 00

District: 001

Polling place: Gallup Hill School

Voter ID: 004721189

Congressional District: 002

House District: 042

Senate District: 019

Julie R Babcock Adress & Maps

Show Map
Show Map

Mailing Address

Po Box 304, Old Mystic, Ct 063720304 United States

Thomas Gerard Adams

Neighbors for Julie R Babcock

2 Winfield Way, Ledyard, Ct 06339-1549
No known party affiliation
3 Winfield Way, Ledyard, Ct 06339-1549
No known party affiliation
5 Winfield Way, Ledyard, Ct 06339-1549
No known party affiliation
5 Winfield Way, Ledyard, Ct 06339-1549
No known party affiliation
6 Winfield Way, Ledyard, Ct 06339-1549
No known party affiliation
6 Winfield Way, Ledyard, Ct 06339-1549
No known party affiliation
7 Winfield Way, Ledyard, Ct 06339-1549
No known party affiliation
7 Winfield Way, Ledyard, Ct 06339-1549
No known party affiliation
7 Winfield Way, Ledyard, Ct 06339-1549
No known party affiliation
7 Winfield Way, Ledyard, Ct 06339-1549
No known party affiliation
8 Winfield Way, Ledyard, Ct 06339-1549
No known party affiliation
8 Winfield Way, Ledyard, Ct 06339-1549
No known party affiliation
9 Winfield Way, Ledyard, Ct 06339-1549
No known party affiliation
9 Winfield Way, Ledyard, Ct 06339-1549
No known party affiliation

Income

Salary: $23,182

Net Worth: $840,117

*This information is estimated by an algorithm and does not come from any public data. These numbers are only guesses and should not be considered to be accurate.

View More Results for Babcock