Babbie E Swan

Female, Age 68 Milford, Connecticut

Babbie E Swan is a 68 years old female, born on Friday, 15th of April 1955. She will turn 69 on April 15, 2024. Our records show she currently resides at 168 Kings Highway, Milford, Ct 06460-7924 and is not affiliated with any political party. Babbie is registered to vote in Connecticut since October 25, 2016.

Overview of Babbie E Swan

Age: 68

Gender: female

Birth year: 1955

Lives in: Milford

Babbie E Swan's Voting Profile

Registered to vote since: October 25, 2016

Party Affiliation: No known party affiliation

Status: A

Precinct: 00

District: 117

Polling place: Joseph A Foran High School

Voter ID: 004719207

Congressional District: 003

House District: 117

Senate District: 014

Babbie E Swan Adress & Maps

Show Map

Thomas Gerard Adams

Neighbors for Babbie E Swan

160 Kings Highway, Milford, Ct 06460-8036
No known party affiliation
160 Kings Highway, Milford, Ct 06460-8036
No known party affiliation
160 Kings Highway, Milford, Ct 06460-8036
No known party affiliation
164 Kings Highway, Milford, Ct 06460-7924
No known party affiliation
164 Kings Highway, Milford, Ct 06460-7924
No known party affiliation
166 Kings Highway, Milford, Ct 06460-7924
No known party affiliation
166 Kings Highway, Milford, Ct 06460-7924
No known party affiliation
170 Kings Highway, Milford, Ct 06460-7924
No known party affiliation
170 Kings Highway, Milford, Ct 06460-7924
No known party affiliation
170 Kings Highway, Milford, Ct 06460-7924
No known party affiliation
173 Kings Highway, Milford, Ct 06460-7925
No known party affiliation
173 Kings Highway, Milford, Ct 06460-7925
No known party affiliation
175 Kings Highway, Milford, Ct 06460-7925
No known party affiliation
181 Kings Highway, Milford, Ct 06460-7925
No known party affiliation
181 Kings Highway, Milford, Ct 06460-7925
No known party affiliation

Income

Salary: $43,157

Net Worth: $894,184

*This information is estimated by an algorithm and does not come from any public data. These numbers are only guesses and should not be considered to be accurate.