Shara Ashley

Female, Age 35 New Haven , Connecticut

Shara Ashley is a 35 years old female, born on Sunday, 24th of July 1988. She will turn 36 on July 24, 2025. Our records show she currently resides at 963 Elm Street, New Haven , Ct 06511-4055 and is affiliated with the No known party affiliation. Shara is registered to vote in Connecticut since October 12, 2016.

Overview of Shara Ashley

Age: 35

Gender: female

Birth year: 1988

Lives in: New Haven

Shara Ashley's Voting Profile

Registered to vote since: October 12, 2016

Party Affiliation: No known party affiliation

Status: A

Precinct: 00

District: 024

Polling place: Firehouse Ellsworth

Voter ID: 004689613

Congressional District: 003

House District: 092

Senate District: 010

Shara Ashley Adress & Maps

Show Map

Thomas Gerard Adams

Neighbors for Shara Ashley

954 Elm Street, New Haven , Ct 06511-4058
No known party affiliation
955 Elm Street, New Haven , Ct 06511-4055
No known party affiliation
956 Elm Street, New Haven , Ct 06511-4058
No known party affiliation
959 Elm Street, New Haven , Ct 06511-4055
No known party affiliation
960 Elm Street, New Haven , Ct 06511-4058
No known party affiliation
960 Elm Street, New Haven , Ct 06511-4058
No known party affiliation
961 Elm Street, New Haven , Ct 06511-4055
No known party affiliation
963 Elm Street 2, New Haven , Ct 06511-4055
No known party affiliation
963 Elm Street, New Haven , Ct 06511-4055
No known party affiliation
963 Elm Street, New Haven , Ct 06511-4055
No known party affiliation
963 Elm Street, New Haven , Ct 06511-4055
No known party affiliation
963 Elm Street, New Haven , Ct 06511-4055
No known party affiliation
963 Elm Street, New Haven , Ct 06511-4055
No known party affiliation
963 Elm Street, New Haven , Ct 06511-4055
No known party affiliation
963 Elm Street 2, New Haven , Ct 06511-4055
No known party affiliation

Income

Salary: $42,089

Net Worth: $112,406

*This information is estimated by an algorithm and does not come from any public data. These numbers are only guesses and should not be considered to be accurate.